Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Redd

  • Rank
    Skillfull Tyro
  • Birthday 04/09/1992

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Interests
    Numbers. Giving myself headaches over them^^
  • Playername
  1. Redd

    Hey there.. Thanks for the greetings^^

  2. I can answer that one question!=P

    1. The Great Pashweetie

      The Great Pashweetie

      this is your ownly status update? thats... weird...

  3. Painom naman jan...

  4. @Grido It would be cooler with screenies. Before someone adds MRD to their friends list...
  5. [quote name='Orlando Gardiner' date='16 December 2009 - 11:55 PM' timestamp='1260978929' post='50424'] ...But who would log on each your to get a WP when your not playing it anyway?... [/quote] My point is that, in your idea, a player who plays year-round and someone who just plays on some occasions will have the same reward. Remember that this whole WP scheme is based on the concept of loyalty. So, in your opinion, do they have the same degree of loyalty? I'm guessing not.. I like the idea of giving WPs to quest creators, but the premise of that i
  6. [quote name='Chewett' date='11 December 2009 - 02:42 PM' timestamp='1260513763' post='49620'] Thats what mur was suggesting... But he was more suggesting 6 12 18 24 or 12 24 or just every 24 months... [/quote] 6 months for the first WP? That'll defy the purpose of encouraging new players. As Mur said, the first WP is important, and I agree. I think Observer's idea is good. One WP for newbies(between 2 and three months) another for his first year, then the regular interval of receiving WPs for the second year(every 6 months), and so on.. [quote name='Orlando Gardiner' date='16 Decembe
  7. A WP for having 50 active days is a good encouragement for beginners^^, However, if alts could also obtain WPs, some of the wishes' value could decrease very much. Especially WISH28, which only needs one WP spent to unlock.
  8. I too pertain to love in a relationship. Even I find it hard to believe, but love/relationships can exist(some even more romantic) without lust...

  9. Well then the love is not the way I was meaning. I was meaning in a relationship way.Not in a parent/child way.

  10. I didn't say something about being good, did I. I just said that love may exist without Lust...

  11. Hmm love MUST have lust to be a good relationship.Just like lust MUST have love.

  12. What is love without lust? Unconditional. If you can believe in it...

  13. Well.. never knew this forum would be interesting...

  14. Awww no comments? Thats mean.So Heya.Hows it going? ^^

  • Create New...