Rendril

Yes it is possible for your research to be added as a new clue.

It sounds a like a adobe plugin issue, they are not very stable. [quote name='Pentdragon' timestamp='1322525606' post='96786'] would be nice to be able to switch off the sorting cloud in some kind of "options panel" [/quote] This was a joke, right? This option has been available for months.

Has anyone actually [b]tried[/b] using the needles?

Thank you for the wonderful wishes

Player names are not forbidden from scenes. It is the scene title change wish which may not be used to add player names.

Carroll's work is public domain.

These are [b]public[/b] logs[i]. [/i]No semantically meaningful information can be derived from "." by the public because it lacks context. An inside joke will of course it not seem like spam to you but if it is just between you two, does it really need to be publicized? If it's a quest is it that difficult to indicate as such on the post? [quote] . ------------------ Part of my halting quest. [/quote] The problem is not with the message per se, but that is has no context with which to be understood. As for the PL mods, they are monitored.

[quote name='Darigan' timestamp='1320211590' post='95090'] 2. The problem is that Eon likes to use her stat damage a little too much, and is incredibly overpowered. That is the Communities fault, not Murs [/quote] Eon might like using stat damage, but he does not have a choice about it. That is the double-edged sword of stat damage. Eon may be strong, but he will never be as strong as he could have been.

I like the idea Laphers proposed of having a chance of failure on a spell stone. It does not necessarily have to be based on age or activity, there could be a spell casting stat (for which a high stat would correlate with high age of course), even a function where the more stones a player has used in a day the greater the chance of failure to cast, etc.

It's transitive: Achievements can give WPs WPs can give research points. Therefore, achievements can give research points. It's possible to get research points in other ways too, and more might be added later, I don't see why they should be given from achievements specifically. By the same reasoning it could be said that creatures should be rewarded from achievements, why stop at research points? The reward for getting an achievement is the achievement itself. Remember it's the journey that matters.

[quote name='Mighty Pirate' timestamp='1318066829' post='93540']I got "Work in progress" when I unlocked a second level clue.[/quote] That would be because work was in progress. [quote name='DarkPriestess' timestamp='1318298386' post='93831']Same here. Will those that are still in progress and be obtained be automatically added in our library once they are submitted? Or we will have to spend another research clue to get it again?[/quote] Are you saying the clues were not added to your library?

[quote name='Vicarious' timestamp='1318095502' post='93593'] So, dst's "punishment" was not made public because Grido didn't want me to know? What do I have to do with dst's punishment? O.o Who's choice was it to keep it from me, and what is the reasoning behind this? I don't care what the punishment, I just want to make sure something was done. [/quote] Grido cited you as the reason for not making it public. I neither know nor care what is going on between you two. [quote name='Vicarious' timestamp='1318095502' post='93593'] And that's not true Rendril. I sent several emails to the Co

The issue with unlocking the second research depth has been fixed.

Grido did not make dst's punishment public because he did not want Seighart to know what it was. The council did not investigate because the case was never brought to them. The previous poll resulted as it did because it brought into question Grido's suitability as the LHO leader instead of the way he handled the recent LHO cases.

You are not submitting an essay, writing 1k characters for a submission should hint to you that you have gone beyond the scope of describing the clue. Keep the research in line with the clue you are exploring, having a thesis is not going to nett you additional clues. Get creative if you are desperately in need of more space.

Didn't the announcement already say players who got those certain wishes had them refunded but still had the effects?

I think the request has been pretty clear, Grido.

At what point was this thread about Grido getting demoted or punished in general?

[quote name='Grido' timestamp='1317315362' post='92860'] Dst's situation had, and has, nothing to do with Phantom Orchid's. [/quote] What is under question is not the alleged crimes but your handling of them.

The poll question can skew the results since it is a premise with 2 clauses rather than two premises. I suggest decomposing the question.

There is specifically no gender selection when you sign up. In the context of the game 'him' can refer to both male and female.

Research level 2 achievements have be released today. As it stands each level has its own achievement(s) to unlock it.

In light of this announcement I too must question your judgment, Grido. By your own account another LHO received a punishment yet said punishment remains undisclosed despite inquiries I did not subpoena the information out of good faith, was this a mistake? I echo Tarquinus' statements.

@Rhaegar Targaryen: The reward for submitting good research is that you can have it unlock a clue (and therefore its associated privileges). [quote name='duxie' timestamp='1317120528' post='92613'] [size=3][font=verdana,geneva,sans-serif]yeah, well... but if you want to get a spelldoc (or other available reward which is considerably worth to the person), you will [u]need[/u] to use the 1/10 of WP just for that, and it will already make the "thinking" thingie worthless as you will get the clue too...[/font][/size] [/quote] No, both ways lead to the clue contents being unlocked.(such as sp

Accessing the index of an array does not reserve memory for it, however, it is good practice to perform a check that it exists anyway. Something like this: [code] if(isset(@storage['some_key'] )) { @va = @storage['some_key']; } [/code] Note: you can do the check without isset() but it will throw a notice level warning, in the case of MD script it doesn't matter though because it gets squelched.