Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/07/2014 in all areas

  1. Rophs

    Full Authority Judges

      Two of them needed to agree on any one topic, and two of the three are [redacted] very close irl. Although in a perfect world such ties will not influence decisions made ingame there is lots of potential for corruption with this system.
    3 points
  2. Rophs

    Full Authority Judges

    Suggestion: Add another judge and allow a 3/4 decision to rule.
    2 points
  3. Actually, i think the idea isn't bad. Consider it as a sort of experiment like the pc. We can always create a havoc if we disagree with their judgement. That would cost them a lot more than what they'd earn with power in their hand. Though i'd like to suggest a small change. Instead of a majority rule, make it that, the judgement shall not be passed if any one judge disagrees. That'd put a greater responsibility on their shoulders and you wont have the 'corruption' problem that rophs refered w.r.t personal ties. for all the people who dont want to give them a chance, their credibility is at
    2 points
  4. I chose others. I'd like to do more quests that give more information about interplayer relationships, that would make me appreciate small parts of md that usually we miss, stuff that'd inculcate moral values in me... In one line, a quest that'd influence my emotions and inspire me like md always has...
    2 points
  5. Ungod

    Full Authority Judges

    I agree with Nim here:   I welcome the new judges and hope they will do a great job. I am ready to destroy all their credibility in case I am (considering to have been) judged unfairly.
    1 point
  6. Aeoshattr

    Full Authority Judges

    I may not be popular, but I agree with what most people say. Regardless of whether you say you won't let personal life interfere with decisions in MD, I do not believe it's possible. Say, for instance, a decision must be taken against something that Ailith did - let's say she is truly guilty (only hypothetical, I do not wish to suggest in any way Ailith has done anything). Would you vote against her, to have her banned, for instance? As we assume Ailith would vote in her own interest, thus in order for a fair resolution to be reached (following the assumption she was guilty), you and dst must
    1 point
  7. dst

    Full Authority Judges

    Morality is subjective.
    1 point
  8. Morality vanishes in conflict of interest.
    1 point
  9. We are not living together as much as I wish that was true not actually married yet. As for choices, honestly I think I would have better luck getting Dst to agree with me on more things than Ailith. I hope this isn't taken out of context of what it really is for, such a position I wish wasn't needed nor wanted. But I full well understand why it is needed. Our personal lives do not change our morality in regards to MD.
    1 point
  10. Chewett

    Full Authority Judges

    Ailith had this role beforehand FYI.
    1 point
  11. Agreed with Rophs.   Edit: So if other oldies come back they also get high authority after not playing for 3-4 years?
    1 point
  12. nadrolski

    Happy Birthday

    Belated Happy Birthday, boss Shem :)   High five!
    1 point
  13. nadrolski

    Happy Birthday

    Happy Birthday and a high five to you!
    1 point
  14. Jubaris

    Happy Birthday

    happy birthday!
    1 point
  15. Lania

    Happy Birthday

    Happy birthday! :D
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...