Leaderboard

No one: thanks for the resource stack thing, didn't know that you can't split it. And in the September's quest there were 3 people who won 1st place ( ±2), again, this is a bet.   Grido: Didn't thought it's alt abuse, anyway, fixed. 100% of rewards go to winners :)   Zyrxae: 1.Fixed, 2.Fixed, 3.Yes, 4. 70% of pot goes to first place (and then split equally if there are more), 30% go to second (same split rule).             Oh, and the reason I am using an alt for gathering the rewards is mainly for creatures that will possibly be used to bet, I

Proposal for new in-game implementation.   (...)   3. Tribunal Signpost. After clicking on small information board (~ 7_gate_1 ~, Portal-Gate to Tribunal after Plains of Deceit) there could be a special "welcome text" which introduce Lands of the East to new adventurer. Something like that before Marind's Bell Main Gates or in front of Howling Gates to Necrovion. They were perfectly articulated and real good introduction to overall Land's characteristic.

Ave,   No one is right at this setup it's a bingo not someone wins anyway. I mean yeah last time three got first place but what if nobody gets in ±4 this time. What will you do with the funds? transfer them to the next round?   Miq

That's always been a tricky one, but since this outfit benefits (or degrades) Bookie's reputation and not Andur's (he's merely posting here for Bookie), I don't see the harm. RP-wise, it seems like Andur decided not to run the contest again but did inspire Bookie to fill the void. With a name like Bookie, you'd almost have to.. It will help Bookie's case (and be more fun) if he has a life and personality outside of this operation, though.   Good point; you may want to encourage each person who bets something unsplittable to bet a type of thing that hasn't already been bet. It happ

What happens to the other 10%?   Considering any trade, direct or indirect, from your alt account "bookie" to your main would be classed as alt abuse.     It's actually debatable in my mind if this use of alt accounts should be allowed at all, but I'll leave it to the PC if they want to do anything.

1. resources add up and cannot be split, you'll have to know this when you split the rewards 2. 1st-2nd place should be "the closest" to that number. Otherwise you can rename this to "lottery" / "bingo" as there will be very little chances to get within the ±4  interval

Now that you made me check it , i tried something else: an online action script extractor.   1. we see from UI that the "alfa" is working (dead creatures is shown properly) var integrity = vitality * 100 / vitalityMax; var integrityTxt = Math.floor(integrity) + "%"; var vitalityplus = 0; if(Math.floor(integrity) < 50) { mcLoader3.loadClip("../img/skin/" + siteskin + "/ico_death.png", "death"); _root.death._alpha = 100 - Math.min(100, Math.floor(integrity));   } else { _root.death._alpha = 0; } See that "vitality" and "vitalityMax" are used with no "_root." and as this wo

Since you have a shiny new forum why dont we use it. Previously the balance of killing and revival items were exactly equal meaning that it was possible to revive everyone killed. However possibility did not preclude greed, so this often didnt happen. Now with Mur increasing the ease the ease of killing people, but not of revival like he promised then surely we are going to end up with a large amount of people dead? Molquert exists yes, but that only just about balanced the greed of those holding revival items. In the past the death feature has been directly attributed to one player leaving,

  Good point, and 90+ percent of the time I won't kill for cheap. It took Maebius 20 gold and a morph to get me to go after all the TW's. When I got my contract I decided I'd charge around 4-5 gold per kill (I'll also accept creatures or something else I value around that amount), since it wasn't too much for people to get their hands on, but it also wasn't too cheap where I'd be getting contracts all the time. From PO being killed to the TW's being killed, how much time was between those two contracts? Probably well over a month.   Unless gold starts raining down from the sky I d

Yes, I've threaten No one and you know why. For the rest who don't know: I believe I am the only one with this "right". I've earned it. And why haven't you asked about Maeb or Junior? Why Peace and Azull?   Why are you blaming people for being greedy when there are other options? You have like 3 (THREE) methods (even 4 or 5) to revive someone. Remember when I revived Eon? I used no reviving items and Molly was defo not around. It's called knowledge and most of all it's called determination to actually DO something. When was the last time I didn't get what I wanted in MD (even if that t

  Umm there you go. Threatened No one. SS has a price. Po was revived by me after eon's contract tool was used to kill her following BFH's DOF quest. That sums it up. Fear/greed.   Also if Seig is not liked, that doesn't mean that he shouldn't be revived. Believe me, I like seig as much as you do, if possible even less. But I believe that everyone should have a fair chance to be able to be revived.   Also, this is for the public council to note:   quoting a certain troll:       Quoting an announcement:       It was Seig's dea

If I remember correctly, Spartiats' death triggered the introduction of Molquert. Wasn't there a BIG fuss on the forum and soon after (ok..soon as in MD terms) Molly was created? He was the spark that started the whole thing. So if's pointless to give him as an example. He did his role (even if it was unintentional). Fenrir's case is an exception. Nobody likes him. Not even his so called friends.   Now, Nimmy, I can tell you this: No one asked me if he should revive Peace and/or Azull. I said a big No and threaten him to kill him and take his reviving item. SS can be contacted and he

  Umm there was a big forum post. There was a funeral, and people created a hullabaloo about it. But no one came forward to help revive him. I agree what he did was a bit stupid. But still.   Edit: That was for seig. Yeah.. there was some heat ceremony for spar i think. Those days that was the only way to revive. But in the end nothing really happened.   http://magicduel.invisionzone.com/topic/12327-im-the-ghost-of-sparta-goe-now-is-haunted-by-a-ghost-becareful/#entry112309

  Tom, a simple message in a mood panel "Help me with revival" or personal message to me, your friend would be enough to start organizing things for your revival. Is it too much? I am persuaded - nobody must be dead for months if he/she does at least anything or asks for help. I have been dead more than once and I know what I am talking about. It was fun to do Molquerts tasks, being creative, I took it as a personal quest and stayed dead for long because I enjoyed playing dead. But I am sure there are ways of revival if somebody is seeking them. I dont know Spartialis, I dont know his mo

Spar was killed and left the game because of it. No "friends" came to help. ------- I made the post in the councils forum, to see what our public council has to say.

Azull, don't be a drama queen. It doesn't suit you. Really. Don't blame the whole land for something a member has done. Not to mention he used IN GAME resources and not some sort of bug or anything NOR did he break any rules. As for the alleged master mind...this is all morals and if YOU, as Necro, start to complain/care about morals then Necro is doomed. If you blame the whole land then you're denying them the right to individuality. That is defo not right and in my eyes a bigger crime than you can imagine (not that my opinion matters in this but that's why we have the forum - to express op

No. The ration killing/revival items is the right one. The cooldown is also the right one. Reviving items have 1 month cooldown. Killing have 2. There are how many? 4? 5 killing items? And probably 6 or 7 revival ones (thanks to Nimmy and her quest). I REALLY don't see an unbalance here. To be perfectly honest, there are too many reviving items for my taste (remember there are also one time revivals out there!).   Now, about Eon's contract: it takes 2 to tango. Eon will kill if only hired. Even if he'd want to kill just because he hates someone, in theory, he would not be able to. He ha

1 1/2 years back I had a Quest Idea which was dealing with the whole "being dead" scenario. Some months ago I was sharing it privately with someone and got discouraged. Now things are getting more complicated and the whole thing is getting more and more a bigger public "issue". I would like to share the idea as possibility for all of us to work on (if possible at all).   Here is the short description:   A dead player would have the choice to be "moved" to the other side of life, lets call it afterlife world, the quest would start in this case. In my idea its a blurred version of

Kill me first then if you are going to kill anyone, Show your conviction if you are going to blame people in my land.

   Greetings to the second edition of...the bet.      This month's 'quest' will be different. I will not ask for sponsors anymore but instead..  Anyone that bets on this topic, must 'discard' something in value of approx. 1 SC. Be it resource, an item, creature, or even a SC (duh).       ~~ ANY ammount of resource above 10 will count in value (for this quest only) as 1SC, and if such ammount already exists on the recipient when you add more, it won't count as a bet. ~~       These soon-to-be rewards will be gathered on an

HI Mur ,   you probably did not read all that forums (much was written on that sujbect)   but ill say again my toughts   the killing in MD is bad and i mean BAD!   bad because its like an banishment   what is wrong is that this banisment is not made by MD administration for bad beivior , but its in the hands of players and they are free to use it or not and i have seen it use much for fun or quests with no previous aceptance of that by participants   what is unbalance is that the one that is killed, had no mean of defence agains that, had no sanctuary

  I think it's time you put aside your resentment because it is not benefiting the game. It is a possible solution to a quite bothering bug. Vocal or not he might be right. Plus, he did apologise for being "vocal".

Chew's not obliged to fix anything, is he? It'd sure be nice if he'd put aside personal remarks and disagreements for the sake of everybody in the game, but he doesn't have to.