Jump to content

Kamisha

Member
  • Content Count

    421
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Reputation Activity

  1. Downvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from No one in Seigheart's Auction   
    [quote name='Esmaralda' timestamp='1330452581' post='105424']
    I don't really see what the issue is here. As far as I can tell, he held a slave auction, and from the proceedings he gave half to all the slaves, and kept half for himself. That is a win-win situation. The slaves came in with nothing, and left with coin (and a leash around their neck . He also left with coin. I don't see what's so bad about this...
    [/quote]

    The problem that people are attempting to submit is that only 50% of the gold and silver where traded and that leases where made. That being said the people with leashes where warned of the possibility of them being made. That much is clear and understood and thus do not have a case. However the holding of 50% of the gold and silver may actually have a case. Seigheart kept 50% of the silver which was not determined in the contract that he showed. However he didn't say that any of it will be kept to himself which is true.

    The thing is that law states that the agreement has to be understood by both sides. Since it is not stated in the contract the slaves could bring that issue to the courts. However the issuing of the leash you may not as the uncertainty was stated.

    Lone wolf pup however has a curious claim that he was not put up with his consent. However he consented before hand which means he was still contractually obligated because he agreed to the terms and the contract did not state any terms of withdrawal and a contract that does not state terms of withdrawal does not allow withdrawal without consent of the 1st and 2nd party.
  2. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Amoran Kalamanira Kol in Seigheart's Auction   
    [quote name='Esmaralda' timestamp='1330452581' post='105424']
    I don't really see what the issue is here. As far as I can tell, he held a slave auction, and from the proceedings he gave half to all the slaves, and kept half for himself. That is a win-win situation. The slaves came in with nothing, and left with coin (and a leash around their neck . He also left with coin. I don't see what's so bad about this...
    [/quote]

    The problem that people are attempting to submit is that only 50% of the gold and silver where traded and that leases where made. That being said the people with leashes where warned of the possibility of them being made. That much is clear and understood and thus do not have a case. However the holding of 50% of the gold and silver may actually have a case. Seigheart kept 50% of the silver which was not determined in the contract that he showed. However he didn't say that any of it will be kept to himself which is true.

    The thing is that law states that the agreement has to be understood by both sides. Since it is not stated in the contract the slaves could bring that issue to the courts. However the issuing of the leash you may not as the uncertainty was stated.

    Lone wolf pup however has a curious claim that he was not put up with his consent. However he consented before hand which means he was still contractually obligated because he agreed to the terms and the contract did not state any terms of withdrawal and a contract that does not state terms of withdrawal does not allow withdrawal without consent of the 1st and 2nd party.
  3. Downvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Watcher in Seigheart's Auction   
    [quote name='Esmaralda' timestamp='1330452581' post='105424']
    I don't really see what the issue is here. As far as I can tell, he held a slave auction, and from the proceedings he gave half to all the slaves, and kept half for himself. That is a win-win situation. The slaves came in with nothing, and left with coin (and a leash around their neck . He also left with coin. I don't see what's so bad about this...
    [/quote]

    The problem that people are attempting to submit is that only 50% of the gold and silver where traded and that leases where made. That being said the people with leashes where warned of the possibility of them being made. That much is clear and understood and thus do not have a case. However the holding of 50% of the gold and silver may actually have a case. Seigheart kept 50% of the silver which was not determined in the contract that he showed. However he didn't say that any of it will be kept to himself which is true.

    The thing is that law states that the agreement has to be understood by both sides. Since it is not stated in the contract the slaves could bring that issue to the courts. However the issuing of the leash you may not as the uncertainty was stated.

    Lone wolf pup however has a curious claim that he was not put up with his consent. However he consented before hand which means he was still contractually obligated because he agreed to the terms and the contract did not state any terms of withdrawal and a contract that does not state terms of withdrawal does not allow withdrawal without consent of the 1st and 2nd party.
  4. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Liberty4life in Seigheart's Auction   
    [quote name='Esmaralda' timestamp='1330452581' post='105424']
    I don't really see what the issue is here. As far as I can tell, he held a slave auction, and from the proceedings he gave half to all the slaves, and kept half for himself. That is a win-win situation. The slaves came in with nothing, and left with coin (and a leash around their neck . He also left with coin. I don't see what's so bad about this...
    [/quote]

    The problem that people are attempting to submit is that only 50% of the gold and silver where traded and that leases where made. That being said the people with leashes where warned of the possibility of them being made. That much is clear and understood and thus do not have a case. However the holding of 50% of the gold and silver may actually have a case. Seigheart kept 50% of the silver which was not determined in the contract that he showed. However he didn't say that any of it will be kept to himself which is true.

    The thing is that law states that the agreement has to be understood by both sides. Since it is not stated in the contract the slaves could bring that issue to the courts. However the issuing of the leash you may not as the uncertainty was stated.

    Lone wolf pup however has a curious claim that he was not put up with his consent. However he consented before hand which means he was still contractually obligated because he agreed to the terms and the contract did not state any terms of withdrawal and a contract that does not state terms of withdrawal does not allow withdrawal without consent of the 1st and 2nd party.
  5. Downvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Watcher in Lottery   
    Im sort of cautious on the wish point idea. It may not be clear but I think that is um buying a wish point because you are putting 6sc in you although only possibly getting a wish point out. I think there was a game similar to this one that the wish point was controversial. I dont have the time to look but its somewhere in there. If somebody finds the post please post a link.
  6. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Jubaris in Lottery   
    Im sort of cautious on the wish point idea. It may not be clear but I think that is um buying a wish point because you are putting 6sc in you although only possibly getting a wish point out. I think there was a game similar to this one that the wish point was controversial. I dont have the time to look but its somewhere in there. If somebody finds the post please post a link.
  7. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Chewett in Lottery   
    Im sort of cautious on the wish point idea. It may not be clear but I think that is um buying a wish point because you are putting 6sc in you although only possibly getting a wish point out. I think there was a game similar to this one that the wish point was controversial. I dont have the time to look but its somewhere in there. If somebody finds the post please post a link.
  8. Downvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Dragual in Shared Slave Item   
    I have said what I have to say and stand by that. I am not going to argue this anymore but don't take this as my defeat. If somebody else has something to add that they find a problem with please add. I have exams coming up and I don't have the time to restate my self.
  9. Upvote
    Kamisha reacted to dst in Resource Depletion   
    No Yrthilian, you are sooo wrong and also hypocrite in your comment.

    You hate Eon so you take any opportunity to put him in a bad light. Should I remind you the time you used your own tool to harvest Loreroot's resources when only the Wood Cutters had the ability ?
    Again, it comes down to game mechanics. EVERY SINGLE TIME someone doesn't like what another person does using the mechanisms offered by the game you start yelling BUG ABUSERS (when it's NOT the case -see the illusions issue) or THIEVES (see current issue).

    When Eon took over TW and Peace got it back through illusions, nobody yelled BUGS! RUN! No. Everybody was happy.

    I don't even know why I bother....EVERYTHING Eon does is frown upon. That's why I will keep helping him as much as I can.
    Also, start hunting me: I plan to gather some Lumber soon. And I don't intend to leave 2/3 of the resource in place.
  10. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Dragual in WTS GOOD STUFF   
    Master I think I will classify this as a bidding war so you just matched by bid since 1g = 15 sc so my offer is 4gc 31 sc If that doesent cut it then 6gc and 1 sc. You have your choice.
  11. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Dragual in Well I am Wrighting   
    Every once and I while I get irritated with my self and start to wright. Alot of them go to a point but dont really have an ending but I think I have got one in mind. I am also attempting to challange my self by righting a first person female character. I have tried to wright female characters before from a third person view often from a first person male so this is somewhat new to me. There are some differences in chracter between a male and a female reaction so I am worried if the charcter first of all seems beleveable and second of all likeable. I am still working on a name so any suggestions would be helpful.

    This is simply a draft the prologue so its not much to go on but before I venture any fearther into the unknowen I need some feedback in order to stop me from running beside the train and actually jump on. I find it a little choppy here and rushed I will fix that when I have time to look it over more carefully.

    Prologue:

    “What is this place why am I here.” where the only thoughts that echoed through my head when I awoke. I had yet to open my eyes but my last memory did not include the lapping of waves against a coastal land mass and the occasional rushing sound of a large wave. I opened my green eyes and saw a figure fairly close but still far enough away that I hadn’t been noticed. As my vision was still focusing as I stood up I called out. “Hey can you tell me where I am”. The figure turned to face me the expression was sad. Her eyes where green the hair was brunette and long and stopped just before the shoulders; she was slim but still showed intensity and strength of both character but also dynamic emotion. Without warning she spoke.
    “So this was your doing.” Her expression had changed from a sad expression to a cautious smile.
    “No” I wheeled around in place to face the other direction. “But I have to say I couldn’t have picked a better method the time and placement is almost well let’s say adequate but I think we both know it’s more than that.” The other voice was that of a man’s the entire figure of him was black hidden by the suns light behind him. I turned back to the women. “Hold on a tick. That’s me I said looking at the women. At least I think so…” I said quietly allowed. “If that’s me then who am I” I held up my hands to look at them inquisitively but all I was met with was nothing.
    The version of me that was still visible replied with a small laugh “Well isn’t that true enough right back where we started right where we need to be.”
    “That’s right” replied the man “I really wish we could have met under better circumstances.”
    “Well we both knew it would come to this”
    “Your right as always” The man pulled out a sharp knife. “Right as always” He repeated again softly.
    As he repeated it a second time my eyes opened. I was on the shore line that I had seen in what I guess must have been a dream and still I was wondering how I got there.
  12. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Eon in Complaint against your BHC Organizer   
    [quote name='phantasm' timestamp='1328530461' post='103630']
    As an organizer of an event, doesn't Eon have public points like Grido and the Kings had? If enough complaints come in about an "unfair" leadership of the event, he should be docked a public point. Besides that there isn't much to be done besides blowing air around.
    [/quote]

    Not nessarly becouse there nameisnt public points they are penalty points which are determined by murs judgment on different issues.Penalty points where docked on not public opinion but in the case that they did something wrong or failed to complete duties assigned. I even saw a fourm post put up by mur which if the kings didnt respond within 24 hours they would be docked a point. I am going to tell it straight, at the current moment there is no proof to support any claims which have been making there way into this conversation as there is no proof of specific victimization as I have already said and duxie eaither knowingly or unwittingly has agreed with.

    The basic point that Ican make is that for the current moment at least you dont fulfill any of the requirments in order to have a case. You cant supply mens rea becouse you have no proof that the intent was to hurt your chances. You also cant support actus rea becouse you cant show that you where directly victimized for any reason other than being in the wrong place.

    If you are there and Eon is there you should be exspecting an attack as an inevatbility unless you are fast on the mouse and have the user list refresh at the right time.
  13. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Eon in Complaint against your BHC Organizer   
    I do like people being open to starting a case but I also done like it when there is not too much of a case. I dont like eon anymore than the other person but your proof simply isnt there.
    Unless he says he is not going to attack competeing players in his original post that can not be your reason for suing and from what I see I see that knowhere. The second is if he is taking heads you have to prove two things.
    There is actus rea- the act bing commited ( I still have yet to see proof)
    There is also mens rea- meaning guilty mind or intending to do something.

    If you do want this to go to court you need definitive proof that he took heads from you. With this though he could call that he had not idea and could get away with no more than a sore wrist and told to be more carful in the future.

    The next is mens rea which is going to be difficult this time. You will need to prove that he intended to do so. So consecutive attacks all that claim heads. This time it may be hard but if you can prove actus rea multiple times it can constitute mens rea becouse when the onus (Having to present evedence to clear himself) shifts to him he cant claim due cause (meaning that he took steps in order to prevent it in the future).

    From what I have seen so far (not much) you dont have a case.
  14. Downvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Junior in Complaint against your BHC Organizer   
    I do like people being open to starting a case but I also done like it when there is not too much of a case. I dont like eon anymore than the other person but your proof simply isnt there.
    Unless he says he is not going to attack competeing players in his original post that can not be your reason for suing and from what I see I see that knowhere. The second is if he is taking heads you have to prove two things.
    There is actus rea- the act bing commited ( I still have yet to see proof)
    There is also mens rea- meaning guilty mind or intending to do something.

    If you do want this to go to court you need definitive proof that he took heads from you. With this though he could call that he had not idea and could get away with no more than a sore wrist and told to be more carful in the future.

    The next is mens rea which is going to be difficult this time. You will need to prove that he intended to do so. So consecutive attacks all that claim heads. This time it may be hard but if you can prove actus rea multiple times it can constitute mens rea becouse when the onus (Having to present evedence to clear himself) shifts to him he cant claim due cause (meaning that he took steps in order to prevent it in the future).

    From what I have seen so far (not much) you dont have a case.
  15. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Eon in Complaint against your BHC Organizer   
    [quote name='Udgard' timestamp='1328520361' post='103607']
    I guess the question is: is being able to take heads, but not scoring, count as "competing"?
    [/quote]

    That is the accusation.
    Though however how I see it is that anybody who participates in the boss heads contest also has the ability to steal heads. That is all fair and good. There are the people that are in the normal heads contest who are shooting for the bounty as well and thats all fair and good apparently as well. Though eon gets in the midst and apparently there is a uproar about that. I really dont see it though to tell you the truth. While it is an organizer any normal person in the normal heads contest could interfear and swad the result anyway they want which is another reason why I see there is not much of a case.
    I also see no preticular reason to suspect that nadrolski or childofsoul were specific singled out and victimized and good luck proving that they where if thats there case.

    I just see the whole thing sketchy. I mean eon attacks almost indiscriminently and if you are in the wrong place at the wrong time your fair game. I just see eon being eon.
  16. Downvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Chewett in Complaint against your BHC Organizer   
    [quote name='Udgard' timestamp='1328520361' post='103607']
    I guess the question is: is being able to take heads, but not scoring, count as "competing"?
    [/quote]

    That is the accusation.
    Though however how I see it is that anybody who participates in the boss heads contest also has the ability to steal heads. That is all fair and good. There are the people that are in the normal heads contest who are shooting for the bounty as well and thats all fair and good apparently as well. Though eon gets in the midst and apparently there is a uproar about that. I really dont see it though to tell you the truth. While it is an organizer any normal person in the normal heads contest could interfear and swad the result anyway they want which is another reason why I see there is not much of a case.
    I also see no preticular reason to suspect that nadrolski or childofsoul were specific singled out and victimized and good luck proving that they where if thats there case.

    I just see the whole thing sketchy. I mean eon attacks almost indiscriminently and if you are in the wrong place at the wrong time your fair game. I just see eon being eon.
  17. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Chewett in Slave Auction   
    [quote name='Chengmingz' timestamp='1328226604' post='103226']
    Buy me and I will be your best friend.

    C
    [/quote]

    A possible soon to be regent attempting to be sold into slavery. Wow it seems like the more important people want to be sold. Imagine the power of having a regent your slave.
  18. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Dragual in Slave Auction   
    [quote name='Chengmingz' timestamp='1328226604' post='103226']
    Buy me and I will be your best friend.

    C
    [/quote]

    A possible soon to be regent attempting to be sold into slavery. Wow it seems like the more important people want to be sold. Imagine the power of having a regent your slave.
  19. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Udgard in changing already set location subtitle   
    I beleve you get the wish back after its over written Esmaralda or at least that is my understanding of it. I also beleve mur can decree and lock a location to that subtitle. That being said though if mur thought the location was important enough to keep it as it was he would he didn't so we can conclude that the location was not monumental enough in Jesters image to be worth keeping or just not watching.

    I will not try to put words in murs mouth so its just speculation and observation.
  20. Downvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Watcher in Declare War Spell   
    [quote name='ChildOfTheSoul' timestamp='1328039725' post='102999']
    I agree that MD should have more of an interface designed to facilitate war. If a war spell like that does get made, I would suggest making it a four cast or less spell, just so a person can't make a "declare war" stone. haha.

    There are other ways to accomplish the same task other than making "Declare War" into a spell. There could be an item or, like I said, a programmed interface. I suppose we'll see what happens with the monarchy and government system.
    [/quote]

    I do like the idea of an item as it allows the ability of the king to give the priorties of starting and ending wars to a stratagist or appointed military leader. So the king can build a small hierarchy around him self as oppose to one person controling all land affairs. It is sort of like the signet ring. If the king is to busy or just not willing he can pass the ring to somebody else to take care of citizenship.
  21. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Dragual in Declare War Spell   
    [quote name='ChildOfTheSoul' timestamp='1328039725' post='102999']
    I agree that MD should have more of an interface designed to facilitate war. If a war spell like that does get made, I would suggest making it a four cast or less spell, just so a person can't make a "declare war" stone. haha.

    There are other ways to accomplish the same task other than making "Declare War" into a spell. There could be an item or, like I said, a programmed interface. I suppose we'll see what happens with the monarchy and government system.
    [/quote]

    I do like the idea of an item as it allows the ability of the king to give the priorties of starting and ending wars to a stratagist or appointed military leader. So the king can build a small hierarchy around him self as oppose to one person controling all land affairs. It is sort of like the signet ring. If the king is to busy or just not willing he can pass the ring to somebody else to take care of citizenship.
  22. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Dragual in Declare War Spell   
    For what ever its worth which is not much since I am not part of any land or alliance and dont plan to be for an undetermined amount of time I am somewhat for this idea. If you can make something like war integrated it increases the kings ability to go to war against another land. However the spoils of war I am somewhat sketchy on. Since two lands dont agree to go to war. One ussually wants to go to war and the other land is eaither going to agree to go to war and make an offensive before the other side can launch an offensive ot simply play defensivley. If there was a spoils of war prize at the end of every one (I have played MMORPG's that have such a system) it quickly turns into a source of income which causes repeditive attacks on the opposing nation. What I would suggest is only the team launching the initial attack be penalized the creatures in the case of a lose and in the case of a win I would still have to work out. Aparently there is supposed to be some sort of award desposted to the lands treasury after the end of torch war. I dont think that has been decided yet but when that is integrated the spoils in return should be something in that catagory.

    Participation is questionable since allthough you are to abide by your kings wishes mur likes the idea of not taking freewill away completely in most cases (case and point making two rebals in nocrocron when it was first implemented although if he didnt make them they would likely in anycase do so themselves). So there should be freewill element involved sort of like a voting point like during elections but instead of coming to a concensus deciding if they are participating or not. Those who do get involved will be captured if killed and those who dont won't but wont be able to capture opponents either. The king or alliance leader could if they fail to join the war choose to label them as tratoirs though and disband certain members (but I think they can do that already).

    Death toll (or capture toll as I am suggesting) is a hard one though. There are active and none active players. Players who are inactive should be discounted as part of the death toll of wars. Maybe a a system that they adepts have such as the five days leeway of inactivity. If they are inactive for 5 days they are no longer counted and removed from the war. I also would suggest a percentage then a cold hard toll that changes after each death to reach 100% in order to win or after a predetermined time or else somepeople will just hide and prolong the war as long as possible and im an advacate for complete conflict quickly but effectivly to get the point across (not just turn things into a pissing match).

    As for nations that are considered friendly they would be asked to go to war as a combined land. If the other land refused it would be the kings choice eaither to increase there relation.

    I am for this but there are three things to take into account. First this is a huge or monumental amount of coding. Two as Rheagar Targaryen has brought up there are bugs that could be abused at the current moment and the more complex systems you implement ussually more show up. (Just look at skyrims first patch and its backwards flying dragons however bugs can be fixed and disipline can be taken against those who use them.) Third and finally I dont take crdit for creating a perfect system I am just sketching out what I think and throwing in suggestions and a few tweaks.

    Also this is not to be taken as more then a grain of sand. I am not part of a land and have never been part of one so I am no exspert on the topic and dont claim to be.
  23. Downvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Watcher in Declare War Spell   
    For what ever its worth which is not much since I am not part of any land or alliance and dont plan to be for an undetermined amount of time I am somewhat for this idea. If you can make something like war integrated it increases the kings ability to go to war against another land. However the spoils of war I am somewhat sketchy on. Since two lands dont agree to go to war. One ussually wants to go to war and the other land is eaither going to agree to go to war and make an offensive before the other side can launch an offensive ot simply play defensivley. If there was a spoils of war prize at the end of every one (I have played MMORPG's that have such a system) it quickly turns into a source of income which causes repeditive attacks on the opposing nation. What I would suggest is only the team launching the initial attack be penalized the creatures in the case of a lose and in the case of a win I would still have to work out. Aparently there is supposed to be some sort of award desposted to the lands treasury after the end of torch war. I dont think that has been decided yet but when that is integrated the spoils in return should be something in that catagory.

    Participation is questionable since allthough you are to abide by your kings wishes mur likes the idea of not taking freewill away completely in most cases (case and point making two rebals in nocrocron when it was first implemented although if he didnt make them they would likely in anycase do so themselves). So there should be freewill element involved sort of like a voting point like during elections but instead of coming to a concensus deciding if they are participating or not. Those who do get involved will be captured if killed and those who dont won't but wont be able to capture opponents either. The king or alliance leader could if they fail to join the war choose to label them as tratoirs though and disband certain members (but I think they can do that already).

    Death toll (or capture toll as I am suggesting) is a hard one though. There are active and none active players. Players who are inactive should be discounted as part of the death toll of wars. Maybe a a system that they adepts have such as the five days leeway of inactivity. If they are inactive for 5 days they are no longer counted and removed from the war. I also would suggest a percentage then a cold hard toll that changes after each death to reach 100% in order to win or after a predetermined time or else somepeople will just hide and prolong the war as long as possible and im an advacate for complete conflict quickly but effectivly to get the point across (not just turn things into a pissing match).

    As for nations that are considered friendly they would be asked to go to war as a combined land. If the other land refused it would be the kings choice eaither to increase there relation.

    I am for this but there are three things to take into account. First this is a huge or monumental amount of coding. Two as Rheagar Targaryen has brought up there are bugs that could be abused at the current moment and the more complex systems you implement ussually more show up. (Just look at skyrims first patch and its backwards flying dragons however bugs can be fixed and disipline can be taken against those who use them.) Third and finally I dont take crdit for creating a perfect system I am just sketching out what I think and throwing in suggestions and a few tweaks.

    Also this is not to be taken as more then a grain of sand. I am not part of a land and have never been part of one so I am no exspert on the topic and dont claim to be.
  24. Upvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Yrthilian in Declare War Spell   
    For what ever its worth which is not much since I am not part of any land or alliance and dont plan to be for an undetermined amount of time I am somewhat for this idea. If you can make something like war integrated it increases the kings ability to go to war against another land. However the spoils of war I am somewhat sketchy on. Since two lands dont agree to go to war. One ussually wants to go to war and the other land is eaither going to agree to go to war and make an offensive before the other side can launch an offensive ot simply play defensivley. If there was a spoils of war prize at the end of every one (I have played MMORPG's that have such a system) it quickly turns into a source of income which causes repeditive attacks on the opposing nation. What I would suggest is only the team launching the initial attack be penalized the creatures in the case of a lose and in the case of a win I would still have to work out. Aparently there is supposed to be some sort of award desposted to the lands treasury after the end of torch war. I dont think that has been decided yet but when that is integrated the spoils in return should be something in that catagory.

    Participation is questionable since allthough you are to abide by your kings wishes mur likes the idea of not taking freewill away completely in most cases (case and point making two rebals in nocrocron when it was first implemented although if he didnt make them they would likely in anycase do so themselves). So there should be freewill element involved sort of like a voting point like during elections but instead of coming to a concensus deciding if they are participating or not. Those who do get involved will be captured if killed and those who dont won't but wont be able to capture opponents either. The king or alliance leader could if they fail to join the war choose to label them as tratoirs though and disband certain members (but I think they can do that already).

    Death toll (or capture toll as I am suggesting) is a hard one though. There are active and none active players. Players who are inactive should be discounted as part of the death toll of wars. Maybe a a system that they adepts have such as the five days leeway of inactivity. If they are inactive for 5 days they are no longer counted and removed from the war. I also would suggest a percentage then a cold hard toll that changes after each death to reach 100% in order to win or after a predetermined time or else somepeople will just hide and prolong the war as long as possible and im an advacate for complete conflict quickly but effectivly to get the point across (not just turn things into a pissing match).

    As for nations that are considered friendly they would be asked to go to war as a combined land. If the other land refused it would be the kings choice eaither to increase there relation.

    I am for this but there are three things to take into account. First this is a huge or monumental amount of coding. Two as Rheagar Targaryen has brought up there are bugs that could be abused at the current moment and the more complex systems you implement ussually more show up. (Just look at skyrims first patch and its backwards flying dragons however bugs can be fixed and disipline can be taken against those who use them.) Third and finally I dont take crdit for creating a perfect system I am just sketching out what I think and throwing in suggestions and a few tweaks.

    Also this is not to be taken as more then a grain of sand. I am not part of a land and have never been part of one so I am no exspert on the topic and dont claim to be.
  25. Downvote
    Kamisha got a reaction from Chewett in changing already set location subtitle   
    I beleve you get the wish back after its over written Esmaralda or at least that is my understanding of it. I also beleve mur can decree and lock a location to that subtitle. That being said though if mur thought the location was important enough to keep it as it was he would he didn't so we can conclude that the location was not monumental enough in Jesters image to be worth keeping or just not watching.

    I will not try to put words in murs mouth so its just speculation and observation.
×
×
  • Create New...