Jump to content

SageWoman

Member
  • Content Count

    534
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Reputation Activity

  1. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from BFH in Twas The Night Before Christmas!   
    Ok Everyone....and the rest of you players! Here is OUR submission.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yijkqge_9uo
  2. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from adiomino in Tourist Souveniers   
    [quote name='Grido' date='28 August 2009 - 04:07 PM' timestamp='1251493676' post='40405']
    should i repeat "Magicduel is a unique mmorpg" ?

    unique meaning it doesnt really follow other ones? and selling t-shirts would be joining the corporate market?
    [/quote]

    Like your comic strip, you lack imagination. This topic was just for FUN. I bet you can't even come up with a t-shirt slogan.
  3. Downvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Eon in The Beginning To...a Quest?   
    Hello O Dark and Accursed Leader of the Caretakers!

    Remember you telling me NOT to go to the temple? Well, I went anyways. Met Sephirah just outside of it. Lovely person. Btw, I am now accused of stealing from the lands. I didn't and I resent being called a liar. Just thought I would tell you the straight of it. Sephirah never did say what I had in my hands, for they were empty when I visited the Tribunal city and empty when I jumped to Leader.

    The Light in Your Darkest Hour

    Sagewoman

    Edited for better clarification of what city.


    Can someone please tell me why my comment is negative marked? A curse upon you for doing so!
  4. Upvote
    SageWoman reacted to Tarquinus in [Necrovion]I Am Rask   
    I have much to say, but I am not sure how much of it [u]needs[/u] to be said. I will therefore try to keep my remarks relatively brief.

    [list=1]
    [*][b]Language.[/b] dst raises the valid concern of my pompous, high-flown language being problematic for non-native speakers. Sorry about that. I'll try to tone it down, and to include synonyms [word-equivalents] in brackets [] where I simply can't resist the temptation to use a fancy word.

    [*][b]Semantics.[/b] @ Zlei - the question of the usage of "hubris" is indeed a semantic [definition-oriented] one, and therefore of trivial [minor] importance to the discussion. Therefore let us agree to courteously disagree, eh?

    [*][b]Right.[/b] The legitimacy of Rask's claim [i]de jure,[/i] [by "right" or law] is actually in my mind pretty strong given Rask's parentage, and those of you who [i]reckon without his mother[/i] are doing yourselves a disservice. Pamplemousse and Jester both dismiss the [i]de jure[/i] claim as void because the House of Khalazdad's tenure [possession] of the throne has been surrendered. Rask appears to have abandoned this angle of his claim for now, and that makes things simpler.

    [*][b]Fact.[/b] Rask now seems to claim he can [u]prove[/u] his fitness to rule, and this claim is consistent with the desert culture of his father ("kill them for their water") and the strongly patriarchal culture of his mother from the counter-Earth ("be defined by the swords of others"). If that is the case, let him prove himself in fact. Such proof requires no further words on the forum from anyone.

    [*][b]History.[/b] I am a little annoyed by the readiness of others to dismiss Rask's knowledge of the shades, and more annoyed by the assertion [claim] that the shades' will is not relevant. I encourage everyone to consider what Khalazdad's tag was and how he got it. Again, Rask's education at the hands of his very intelligent and well-versed mother should not be dismissed out of hand. It is easy to try to lampoon [ridicule] Rask as a fiction, but he is not an easy fiction because his existence is grounded in in-game events to which I, as Keith Moon, am a witness. I am not the only witness, either. That grounding makes a difference to me as an historian, even if it makes none to anyone else.

    [*][b]Alts.[/b] The fact that Rask is the alt of Kittiness, a now defunct account, means very little to me. It is certainly not, to my way of thinking, a reason to exclude him from serious consideration.

    [*][b]Roleplay.[/b] MagicDuel has historically had an uneasy relationship with roleplay. Rask, you might not realize that roleplay is technically forbidden in the forums. That is why I, at least, do not address the relationship of either of my developed characters* to the House of Khalazdad. I think it is clear that you, Rask/Kitti, are a strong roleplayer and have something to offer the game. Welcome back. Show us what you can do.
    [/list]
    *I have another alt, Konstantin Harknesse, who sees little use and has not been much developed as a character.

    If you're still reading at this point, thanks for your attention.
  5. Upvote
    SageWoman reacted to Manda in Colored Guards !   
    The ideas is, basically put the guards of the willow shop in colour!!!
    Same with loreroot guards
    (I think its bored, fight againts the same thing 3 times in story mode)

    But only at level 4-5 if all are agree

    No more Aramor now will be Imperial Armour.
    and (maybe) to be a bit dificult put 2 pimped
    now.

    First Guard

    4 Imperials LV 2, (maybe 2 Pimped Gassan LV 2 )
    Targets can be discussed.

    Second Guard

    4 Max Imperials 2 Pinped Gassan at max (well 2 imps 2 armor at max lol)

    (This change to mp3 and 4 too i mean now add to 1 shop guard 2 gassan lv1 and guard 2 gassan lv2)

    In loreroot

    only add color to Master lorerootian archer ( Master Sharptear)

    well as i wrote

    maybe can be implemented one ritual that protects the MB creatures Necro creatures and GG too (well = no one can get those )

    set one image like Karnator commander
    (but with the respective creatures or some nice desing)

    the idea is in mp4-5 (maybe mp3)
    click that image and fight agaisnt it
    im MB basic creats of MB
    Scourt + Heretic Archer + Elemental I (Mp3)
    winderwild (maybe full grow winder) Dar archer II(x2-3) elemental III Mp4

    COLORED
    BPCA 2 CA Majestic Winderwild (1-2) MAX Elemental (or elemental IV 1-2) (Mp5)

    at angien shrine
    one pic (like KC but with angien) and fight against angiens
    3 lv 1 angiens 500 VE each (mp3)
    3 lv 3 angiens 1500 VE each (mp4)
    3 Max angiens (2 normal 1 tainted maybe) double VE

    Necro

    Unholy + TS (Mp3)
    2 unholy lv2 + 3 TS lv 3 (Mp4)
    2 Unholy popes + 1Soulweaber + 2 Revoltedskill vampire

    GG
    3 Babies GG (Mp3)
    1 GG drach LV 2 +2 GG drach Lv 3(Mp4)
    1GG drach max + 2 Rust gold max (or 1Rust 1 Rein at MAX LV)



    (create one more medal or log for not need to fight agains the same every time that you need creats)

    Now what you think
  6. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from apophys in A Letter To The Powers That Be   
    To: The Powers That Be
    c/o Muratus Del Mur


    Dear Secret Members of the Powers that Be,

    It has been long past due that a feature be created for players in regards to the Adepts Page. I have sent messages in the past to our Master, Muratus Del Mur, about this topic in years past to no avail. I now put the idea out to you.

    Consider this if you will. I have counted my adepts and I have an extensive list of 56 Adepts. Out of those 56 adepts, I have three that are active at this time, at the most 11. Some of these inactive adepts I have not seen in the realm of MagicDuel since year 3 and the early part of year 4.

    I propose, that a feature be created that players are able to kick inactive adepts after a certain amount of time; say a month for example. Like removing people from friends list, I do think a small penalty for kicking adepts should be implemented. This might insure that adepts won't be abusively kicked out of spite. On the other hand, if they adepts have been inactive for a longer time, say 6 months, than no penalty shall be levied against the player.

    I do hope that this idea has some merit to the minds of your collective group and believe that it will be a beneficial one to the players of MagicDuel. Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Sincerely

    Sagewoman
    Elder Guardian of the Root
    Hostess of the ROTM Inn
  7. Downvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Eon in A Letter To The Powers That Be   
    To: The Powers That Be
    c/o Muratus Del Mur


    Dear Secret Members of the Powers that Be,

    It has been long past due that a feature be created for players in regards to the Adepts Page. I have sent messages in the past to our Master, Muratus Del Mur, about this topic in years past to no avail. I now put the idea out to you.

    Consider this if you will. I have counted my adepts and I have an extensive list of 56 Adepts. Out of those 56 adepts, I have three that are active at this time, at the most 11. Some of these inactive adepts I have not seen in the realm of MagicDuel since year 3 and the early part of year 4.

    I propose, that a feature be created that players are able to kick inactive adepts after a certain amount of time; say a month for example. Like removing people from friends list, I do think a small penalty for kicking adepts should be implemented. This might insure that adepts won't be abusively kicked out of spite. On the other hand, if they adepts have been inactive for a longer time, say 6 months, than no penalty shall be levied against the player.

    I do hope that this idea has some merit to the minds of your collective group and believe that it will be a beneficial one to the players of MagicDuel. Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Sincerely

    Sagewoman
    Elder Guardian of the Root
    Hostess of the ROTM Inn
  8. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Kyphis the Bard in A Letter To The Powers That Be   
    To: The Powers That Be
    c/o Muratus Del Mur


    Dear Secret Members of the Powers that Be,

    It has been long past due that a feature be created for players in regards to the Adepts Page. I have sent messages in the past to our Master, Muratus Del Mur, about this topic in years past to no avail. I now put the idea out to you.

    Consider this if you will. I have counted my adepts and I have an extensive list of 56 Adepts. Out of those 56 adepts, I have three that are active at this time, at the most 11. Some of these inactive adepts I have not seen in the realm of MagicDuel since year 3 and the early part of year 4.

    I propose, that a feature be created that players are able to kick inactive adepts after a certain amount of time; say a month for example. Like removing people from friends list, I do think a small penalty for kicking adepts should be implemented. This might insure that adepts won't be abusively kicked out of spite. On the other hand, if they adepts have been inactive for a longer time, say 6 months, than no penalty shall be levied against the player.

    I do hope that this idea has some merit to the minds of your collective group and believe that it will be a beneficial one to the players of MagicDuel. Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Sincerely

    Sagewoman
    Elder Guardian of the Root
    Hostess of the ROTM Inn
  9. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from adiomino in A Letter To The Powers That Be   
    To: The Powers That Be
    c/o Muratus Del Mur


    Dear Secret Members of the Powers that Be,

    It has been long past due that a feature be created for players in regards to the Adepts Page. I have sent messages in the past to our Master, Muratus Del Mur, about this topic in years past to no avail. I now put the idea out to you.

    Consider this if you will. I have counted my adepts and I have an extensive list of 56 Adepts. Out of those 56 adepts, I have three that are active at this time, at the most 11. Some of these inactive adepts I have not seen in the realm of MagicDuel since year 3 and the early part of year 4.

    I propose, that a feature be created that players are able to kick inactive adepts after a certain amount of time; say a month for example. Like removing people from friends list, I do think a small penalty for kicking adepts should be implemented. This might insure that adepts won't be abusively kicked out of spite. On the other hand, if they adepts have been inactive for a longer time, say 6 months, than no penalty shall be levied against the player.

    I do hope that this idea has some merit to the minds of your collective group and believe that it will be a beneficial one to the players of MagicDuel. Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Sincerely

    Sagewoman
    Elder Guardian of the Root
    Hostess of the ROTM Inn
  10. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from cutler121 in A Letter To The Powers That Be   
    To: The Powers That Be
    c/o Muratus Del Mur


    Dear Secret Members of the Powers that Be,

    It has been long past due that a feature be created for players in regards to the Adepts Page. I have sent messages in the past to our Master, Muratus Del Mur, about this topic in years past to no avail. I now put the idea out to you.

    Consider this if you will. I have counted my adepts and I have an extensive list of 56 Adepts. Out of those 56 adepts, I have three that are active at this time, at the most 11. Some of these inactive adepts I have not seen in the realm of MagicDuel since year 3 and the early part of year 4.

    I propose, that a feature be created that players are able to kick inactive adepts after a certain amount of time; say a month for example. Like removing people from friends list, I do think a small penalty for kicking adepts should be implemented. This might insure that adepts won't be abusively kicked out of spite. On the other hand, if they adepts have been inactive for a longer time, say 6 months, than no penalty shall be levied against the player.

    I do hope that this idea has some merit to the minds of your collective group and believe that it will be a beneficial one to the players of MagicDuel. Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Sincerely

    Sagewoman
    Elder Guardian of the Root
    Hostess of the ROTM Inn
  11. Downvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Watcher in I Dream Of Ducks   
    *nerve tick goes off by her right eye*

    Hail the Mad! Hail the Sad!
    Those who hide behind the Mask.
    Poetry like ours is Bad.

    Ducks! Yes! Kittens? Aw!
    I bet they forgot the mittens.
    Alas I suck at this
    So I bow out with your permittence.
  12. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Asterdai in I Dream Of Ducks   
    *nerve tick goes off by her right eye*

    Hail the Mad! Hail the Sad!
    Those who hide behind the Mask.
    Poetry like ours is Bad.

    Ducks! Yes! Kittens? Aw!
    I bet they forgot the mittens.
    Alas I suck at this
    So I bow out with your permittence.
  13. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Roland in The Beginning To...a Quest?   
    Hello O Dark and Accursed Leader of the Caretakers!

    Remember you telling me NOT to go to the temple? Well, I went anyways. Met Sephirah just outside of it. Lovely person. Btw, I am now accused of stealing from the lands. I didn't and I resent being called a liar. Just thought I would tell you the straight of it. Sephirah never did say what I had in my hands, for they were empty when I visited the Tribunal city and empty when I jumped to Leader.

    The Light in Your Darkest Hour

    Sagewoman

    Edited for better clarification of what city.


    Can someone please tell me why my comment is negative marked? A curse upon you for doing so!
  14. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from phantasm in The Beginning To...a Quest?   
    Hello O Dark and Accursed Leader of the Caretakers!

    Remember you telling me NOT to go to the temple? Well, I went anyways. Met Sephirah just outside of it. Lovely person. Btw, I am now accused of stealing from the lands. I didn't and I resent being called a liar. Just thought I would tell you the straight of it. Sephirah never did say what I had in my hands, for they were empty when I visited the Tribunal city and empty when I jumped to Leader.

    The Light in Your Darkest Hour

    Sagewoman

    Edited for better clarification of what city.


    Can someone please tell me why my comment is negative marked? A curse upon you for doing so!
  15. Downvote
    SageWoman reacted to Jubaris in Discussion   
    I admire Nimrodel how you manage to turn Firsanthalas who banished Savelites, Marvolo who betrayed the Savelites into a poor old burdened king and a victimized brother. You are learning from the best, I think Firsanthalas should hold school for manipulation, lies, public hypocrisy, media spamming. Talking about biased opinions of Pip, where in fact he gives you the most rational responses, yet you yourself cannot accept that Firsanthalas actually has flaws.
    From when this have started I've [b]NEVER[/b] saw Firsanthalas saying "ok, I might overreacted here, I might made a mistake here". Isn't that some sort of biased opinion? This course of events is really a mess, nobody can say that he did his part perfect.

    -master initiator that's exactly what Firsanthalas condemnded up there, but you seem to present the pacifist part of his thoughts. Add faking to the list of held subjects in Firsanthalas' school. How I love to see when Firsanthalas plays the role of an angry god, and minutes after that, most often, Mya shows up with a fixed smile and a "welcome hug". In this case it is you.
    -you know nothing about my chances given to Firsanthalas so stop talking about them. I will finish the file I mentioned soon I hope and post it somewhere to be seen, my point of view on things, and how I came to them.
    -Mya always had suspicious behavior on me. We talked about that and I think we resolved that during the period, but sadly course of events lead us to separate sides again. Not being able to work with Mya... you need to be more concrete than giving semi-questions and answers, mentioning something than letting people use their imagination to present Rhaegar with horns and fire.
    -So, me rebelling after Firs "tightens his nose" is wrong? He banishes me and sends me to prison... but that's perfectly fine? I could have done much worse later on Nimrodel, going into a mad sabotage wherever I could, you must understand that I have nothing more to lose here, and that's it when people are most dangerous. I chose not to do few things on the end. -Read more details on the following book, only 5 dollars to hear the story of your wildest imagination... - a little joke, but I will tell more about it when I make that file. Isolating case like this only makes my posts longer than needed.
    I am very curios on how long it takes till someone in Loreroot makes an opinion of his/her own. Just a few more years?

    -Nice now I'm accused of robbery. What else?



    About Jazira... Of course she can't continue what I have started completely, if someone starts something in the Church it will most certainly be entirely new (much of my thoughts about it weren't expressed, of course, again, in that file you will find out more). However it makes me unease... I would like to give opportunity to Jazira to do something... it is my moral duty, one of the general principles of the Church for sure to let her do her job if she wants to do some good to the world. It is the dilemma that haunted me last few minutes, should I step up against Jazira, or support her? One of the major problems in it is that most certainly it won't have any refferance to what "my" Savelites were doing, what they standed for, and that most likely they will not be EVER mentioned by her, since she must follow up policy of Firsanthalas to make an alliance... But if she tries do something else that is good, why wouldn't she be able to, people get forgotten all the time? Maybe it is I who should try to preserve that memory, which I try to at least with that Memorial Firsanthalas hates so much...
  16. Upvote
    SageWoman reacted to Nimrodel in Discussion   
    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    First up, Rhaegar was let into the alliance along with other people when Grido and Z tried to rebuild it. He did not rebuild it from nothing like Jazira is now attempting to do.
    He changed it, and you cannot deny that. It doesn't matter if he rebuilt it or not.
    [/quote]

    I seriously don't get your point. Its like all you want to do is negate what Firs says. His statement was with reference to the difference between Jazz's situation and Rhaegar's situation. And yes. Rhaegar did change it. If you talk to many people who knew savel well, they'd say that Savel's Church had long forgotten its intended purpose. But I guess you won't Bother about that all that.

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    Secondly, Rhaegar himself seemed to change the direction and ideas for the Church on several occassions. At one point he started to take up residence in the Tribunal Temple and he spoke about using it as a base for the Savels. That seemed to just peter out after a while. Then he wanted the Savels to be historians in Loreroot, then he started the avatar shop. There is more, but they are the big ones I can think of right off the top of my head.
    Oh no, he tried to do other things! His life didn't revolve around the Savels 100%! He tried to give the Savels a NEW ROLE? BLASPHEMY! Nobody else has ever given an alliance a new role![/quote]

    Oh yes! He did try to give the savels a new role. He had so many projects in his mind... He was a master initiator. But hardly few of them were completed. So where does that put the Church's new role? No where. None of us said it was blasphemous. Or a sin to dream big. Don't try to read in between the lines. There is nothing there. Unless you intend to create a new meaning just like you did right now.

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    Thirdly, he's a blockhead with as much subtlety as a bull in a china shop. He has zero tact and succeeded in royally getting up a lot of people's noses with his crap. He still does. He had an issue with me from day 1. Why? Because he listened to and believed venomous crap that was still boiling over from old wounds in Loreroot. No matter what happened, he never ever got past that. In short, he was a source of conflict within Loreroot and outside it too.
    That doesn't change the fact that you ONLY "put up with him" and didn't try to establish friendly ties. (Simply taking the information from your post, I don't pretend to know about your personal issues)[/quote]

    Didn't try to establish friendly ties? When you dont know what happened, you might as well shut up and not comment. as I said before... Don't try reading in between the lines.There is nothing in there. everything is straightforward and direct, unless of course you want to give stuff a new meaning.

    Besides... it wasn't one sided. If You say firs didn't try then you have to accept that Rhaegar never gave him a chance either. How can you tie a friendly knot if the end of one of the threads is never available?

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    I put up with Rhaegar for as long as I did for one simple fact. I was trying to be fair. I did not want my personal feelings towards him to cloud my judgement and I wanted to give him a chance. Many people felt that I was too soft and I believe that Rhaegar himself started to believe that I was somehow weak and he could push me as much as he wanted. Wrong on that score.
    He's a control freak. He seemed incapable of delegating tasks and only seemed to want to work with people when he felt like it or if he wanted to. By and large he showed little interest in working with anyone outside the Savels.
    Why should he work with anybody if he doesn't want to? As an example, I'm not overly friendly with redneck. Am I going to go to him and say "Hey, wanna help me with a quest?", even if we're in the same alliance? It's not hard to ignore someone or something. For most people, anyways.[/quote]

    Lol... He couldn't even work properly with Mya. I am pretty sure you can vouch for the fact that there is a lot of difference between Mya and redneck. Basically he didnt trust Firs. And thus he didn't trust most guardians. And there in lay the problem.

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    He openly fostered a belief in at least some of the Savels, that if they were in the alliance before the kingship elections, then they didn't have to recognise the king. For any leader of any group in Loreoot to do such a thing is unacceptable. I also found out that things I said concerning his members were either not passed on or twisted. And he insisted that he deal with his members, not me.
    Who cares about his beliefs? Lay down the law, don't stand there and "put up with him". There's a PM system and chat for speaking to people, you don't need to go through him. That's plain lack of effort on your part, if you really wanted to speak to them.[/quote]
    Lol... you saw what happened when Firs tightened the noose. He Rebelled. Still wanna say that Firs never gave him a chance?

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    Activity of the Savels...
    Towards the end of his tenure, there was little or none. Most of the members seemed inactive and at least one member seemed to spend more time outside the alliance than actually in it (not a personal dig by the way, merely the way things seemed).
    You want to talk about inactives? Grayhawk, White Reaper, Mysteria Blue (seemingly back, but still had a long absence), Siala Lone Wolf, Cross Swords and Mojomuppet (not 100% sure) in GotR, and I won't even mention the ones in CoE.
    This is not intended as a shot at GotR or CoE, just don't complain about inactives if you've got plenty under your command.[/quote]

    Mojo muppet? she logs on every single day and trains as well. Rhaegar was responsible for his alliance. And hence came the statement. As for the Inactives in GotR, we have our own filtering system and we aren't answerable to you for that. And by the way, You missed the whole point in firs's statement:

    [quote name='Firsanthalas' timestamp='1284194433' post='68182']
    [b]When I booted him there was almost no reaction from them.[/b] Infact, some of them seemed completely oblivious to what had happened. [b]Personally I was disappointed. I had expected more of a reaction, any reaction.[/b]
    When Marv took over he tried to contact the members and got almost no response until he kicked people.[/quote]

    There.. now its all bold and clear.

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    Savelite items....
    Rhaegar aggressively sought the items that he felt belonged to the church. He was very insistent (to put it mildly) that they belonged to the church. Where are they now? He refused to return the ones he had to Marvolo, when Marvolo took over. I guess that they only belong to the church if Rhaegar is running it. Maybe it should be called the church of Rhaegar?
    Rhaegar bought the items with his own funds, I'm assuming. If another Muffin Man came along and replaced you without your permission, would you willingly give him your muffin-related items if you still considered muffins to be part of your role?[/quote]

    Rhaegar had all of marv's money and said he wouldn't return the money to Marv unless the savellite items which marv had were returned to him. It was quite a lot of money. And no.. Rhaegar didnt buy the items with his own funds. It was marv's money, Church's funds and a few of the items were given to them during the Land item distribution thingy. Get your facts right before you comment.

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    Alliance location..
    Rhaegar himself stated to me very clearly that the Savels belonged in Loreroot and would never leave.
    Opinions change, get over it.[/quote]
    Opinions change? Jazira wants it to be in Loreroot as well. I don't see your point.

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    Savelite memorial....
    Yeah, I find this a mixture of funny and sickening really. For starters it is really a homage to himself and one or two others, as well as a two fingered salute to myself and the rest of Loreroot. He's missing at least one name of an older member from that list and he has included names of people that had long gone before his demise and also some people that were barely there or did anything at all. The Savels are also not dead, so having a 'memorial' is in poor taste in my opinion.
    Marv's Savels were no better than what you seemingly believe Rhaegar's were, and Jazira's plans don't even look like the Savelite Church, they look like the Loreroot Church. Who really cares if he's missing a few names, or included some extra, just because? In the end, it's up to him who goes on, not you. If you disagree, talk to him about it, otherwise, keep your opinion of it to yourself.[/quote]
    Hypocrisy at its highest. You just supported Rhaegar in his desire to give savel's Church a new role, now you whine about jazira's attempt. Frankly If you have a problem with it... speak to her personally or keep your opinion to yourself.
    You see, a few people I know, who really had a good opinion about Rhaegar, seemed to think that it was unforgivable that he set up a memorial when the alliance issues were not really sorted out. Proves that people do care about it.

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    The ultimate irony though, is that the alliance should have a memorial, because it should be put to bed in my opinion. But it seems that people in MD have an inability to let go of the past and move on. If this new incarnation of the alliance does not make something of itself it will be going to alliance heaven. Make no mistakes about it.
    Yey, threats to people who actually wish to see Savelites restored.[/quote]

    You have this thing for making a mountain of a mole hill don't you? Again you are trying to read in between the lines when there is nothing there to read.

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    As for a memorial, that should be something that is done by the MD community (or at the very least the land of the alliance), not by one or two people with an axe to grind.
    So, instead of the former leader of the alliance in question, you'd rather either have everybody (most of the people in this group have never had anything to do with the alliance), or you (who has never been in the alliance) decide who goes on the list? Not to mention, of course, that NOBODY can dictate what who puts on clickables except Mur. You want something else for the memorial? Do it yourself.[/quote]

    He DID NOT DICTATE. He stated an opinion just like you have been stating all along. Or should I assume that you were trying to dictate Firs what to think or do and what not to think or do?

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    Rhaegar had his chance. He blew it royally, so stop this nonsense of saying he should have it back. It is time to give someone else a chance or put the alliance to bed once and for all.
    Yeah, he blew it because of a personal issue between you and him. It was not because of all of that "abuse" you put up with, and it was not because he created an unofficial Lorerootian group without your permission. These things are easily ignored.[/quote]

    First of all, Stop trying to be the insider.You never even liked Rhaegar or Loreroot. You haven't even seen one side of the coin. Wait. Correction. You haven't even seen the cover properly. So you might as well just stop commenting about the other half or judge the entire situation by yourself.

    [quote name='Pipstickz' timestamp='1284199057' post='68185']
    Now, I don't know about the rest of the community, but I'm tired of hearing you ***** and moan and try to justify yourself. I am also VERY tired of hearing Marv spout off every time Rhaegar and the Savels are mentioned in the same paragraph. Everybody knows both of your positions and opinions on the subject already, so the only reasons I can see for these posts are attempts at justification or just pure hatred, and either way, both reasons make you a "blockhead with as much subtlety as a bull in a china shop", in my opinion.[/quote]

    You attention and opinions were not asked for. If you are tired of listening to the so called *****ing and moaning you might as well stop reading or responding to these posts. Trust me it would be a blessing if you did. You have the right to KEEP YOUR FRIGGIN OPINIONS TO YOURSELF or you might talk to the concerned privately. Just as you suggested Firs in your post.

    And oh pip... your posts show your clear dislike against everything related to Loreroot or Yrth whatever it maybe. I am trying my best not to say you are prejudiced or.. *cough* "a blockhead with as much subtlety as a bull in a china shop"
  17. Upvote
    SageWoman reacted to Pipstickz in Discussion   
    [quote name='Firsanthalas' timestamp='1284194433' post='68182']
    First up, Rhaegar was let into the alliance along with other people when Grido and Z tried to rebuild it. He did not rebuild it from nothing like Jazira is now attempting to do.
    [b]He changed it, and you cannot deny that. It doesn't matter if he rebuilt it or not.[/b]

    Secondly, Rhaegar himself seemed to change the direction and ideas for the Church on several occassions. At one point he started to take up residence in the Tribunal Temple and he spoke about using it as a base for the Savels. That seemed to just peter out after a while. Then he wanted the Savels to be historians in Loreroot, then he started the avatar shop. There is more, but they are the big ones I can think of right off the top of my head.
    [b]Oh no, he tried to do other things! His life didn't revolve around the Savels 100%! He tried to give the Savels a NEW ROLE? BLASPHEMY! Nobody else has ever given an alliance a new role![/b]

    Thirdly, he's a blockhead with as much subtlety as a bull in a china shop. He has zero tact and succeeded in royally getting up a lot of people's noses with his crap. He still does. He had an issue with me from day 1. Why? Because he listened to and believed venomous crap that was still boiling over from old wounds in Loreroot. No matter what happened, he never ever got past that. In short, he was a source of conflict within Loreroot and outside it too.
    [b]That doesn't change the fact that you ONLY "put up with him" and didn't try to establish friendly ties. (Simply taking the information from your post, I don't pretend to know about your personal issues)[/b]

    I put up with Rhaegar for as long as I did for one simple fact. I was trying to be fair. I did not want my personal feelings towards him to cloud my judgement and I wanted to give him a chance. Many people felt that I was too soft and I believe that Rhaegar himself started to believe that I was somehow weak and he could push me as much as he wanted. Wrong on that score.
    He's a control freak. He seemed incapable of delegating tasks and only seemed to want to work with people when he felt like it or if he wanted to. By and large he showed little interest in working with anyone outside the Savels.
    [b]Why should he work with anybody if he doesn't want to? As an example, I'm not overly friendly with redneck. Am I going to go to him and say "Hey, wanna help me with a quest?", even if we're in the same alliance? It's not hard to ignore someone or something. For most people, anyways.[/b]

    He openly fostered a belief in at least some of the Savels, that if they were in the alliance before the kingship elections, then they didn't have to recognise the king. For any leader of any group in Loreoot to do such a thing is unacceptable. I also found out that things I said concerning his members were either not passed on or twisted. And he insisted that he deal with his members, not me.
    [b]Who cares about his beliefs? Lay down the law, don't stand there and "put up with him". There's a PM system and chat for speaking to people, you don't need to go through him. That's plain lack of effort on your part, if you really wanted to speak to them.[/b]

    Activity of the Savels...
    Towards the end of his tenure, there was little or none. Most of the members seemed inactive and at least one member seemed to spend more time outside the alliance than actually in it (not a personal dig by the way, merely the way things seemed).
    [b]You want to talk about inactives? Grayhawk, White Reaper, Mysteria Blue (seemingly back, but still had a long absence), Siala Lone Wolf, Cross Swords and Mojomuppet (not 100% sure) in GotR, and I won't even mention the ones in CoE.
    This is not intended as a shot at GotR or CoE, just don't complain about inactives if you've got plenty under your command.[/b]

    When I booted him there was almost no reaction from them. Infact, some of them seemed completely oblivious to what had happened. Personally I was disappointed. I had expected more of a reaction, any reaction.
    When Marv took over he tried to contact the members and got almost no response until he kicked people.
    [b]Not everybody reads the forum, where it all happened, and as you said, many were inactive.[/b]

    Savelite items....
    Rhaegar aggressively sought the items that he felt belonged to the church. He was very insistent (to put it mildly) that they belonged to the church. Where are they now? He refused to return the ones he had to Marvolo, when Marvolo took over. I guess that they only belong to the church if Rhaegar is running it. Maybe it should be called the church of Rhaegar?
    [b]Rhaegar bought the items with his own funds, I'm assuming. If another Muffin Man came along and replaced you without your permission, would you willingly give him your muffin-related items if you still considered muffins to be part of your role?[/b]

    Alliance location..
    Rhaegar himself stated to me very clearly that the Savels belonged in Loreroot and would never leave.
    [b]Opinions change, get over it.[/b]

    Savelite memorial....
    Yeah, I find this a mixture of funny and sickening really. For starters it is really a homage to himself and one or two others, as well as a two fingered salute to myself and the rest of Loreroot. He's missing at least one name of an older member from that list and he has included names of people that had long gone before his demise and also some people that were barely there or did anything at all. The Savels are also not dead, so having a 'memorial' is in poor taste in my opinion.
    [b]Marv's Savels were no better than what you seemingly believe Rhaegar's were, and Jazira's plans don't even look like the Savelite Church, they look like the Loreroot Church. Who really cares if he's missing a few names, or included some extra, just because? In the end, it's up to him who goes on, not you. If you disagree, talk to him about it, otherwise, keep your opinion of it to yourself.[/b]

    The ultimate irony though, is that the alliance should have a memorial, because it should be put to bed in my opinion. But it seems that people in MD have an inability to let go of the past and move on. If this new incarnation of the alliance does not make something of itself it will be going to alliance heaven. Make no mistakes about it.
    [b]Yey, threats to people who actually wish to see Savelites restored.[/b]

    As for a memorial, that should be something that is done by the MD community (or at the very least the land of the alliance), not by one or two people with an axe to grind.
    [b]So, instead of the former leader of the alliance in question, you'd rather either have everybody (most of the people in this group have never had anything to do with the alliance), or you (who has never been in the alliance) decide who goes on the list? Not to mention, of course, that NOBODY can dictate what who puts on clickables except Mur. You want something else for the memorial? Do it yourself.[/b]

    Rhaegar had his chance. He blew it royally, so stop this nonsense of saying he should have it back. It is time to give someone else a chance or put the alliance to bed once and for all.
    [b]Yeah, he blew it because of a personal issue between you and him. It was not because of all of that "abuse" you put up with, and it was not because he created an unofficial Lorerootian group without your permission. These things are easily ignored.[/b]
    [/quote]

    Now, I don't know about the rest of the community, but I'm tired of hearing you ***** and moan and try to justify yourself. I am also VERY tired of hearing Marv spout off every time Rhaegar and the Savels are mentioned in the same paragraph. Everybody knows both of your positions and opinions on the subject already, so the only reasons I can see for these posts are attempts at justification or just pure hatred, and either way, both reasons make you a "blockhead with as much subtlety as a bull in a china shop", in my opinion.

    My edits in bold.
    Sorry for longpost/rant.
  18. Downvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Sephirah Caelum in The Beginning To...a Quest?   
    Hello O Dark and Accursed Leader of the Caretakers!

    Remember you telling me NOT to go to the temple? Well, I went anyways. Met Sephirah just outside of it. Lovely person. Btw, I am now accused of stealing from the lands. I didn't and I resent being called a liar. Just thought I would tell you the straight of it. Sephirah never did say what I had in my hands, for they were empty when I visited the Tribunal city and empty when I jumped to Leader.

    The Light in Your Darkest Hour

    Sagewoman

    Edited for better clarification of what city.


    Can someone please tell me why my comment is negative marked? A curse upon you for doing so!
  19. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Peace in The Beginning To...a Quest?   
    Hello O Dark and Accursed Leader of the Caretakers!

    Remember you telling me NOT to go to the temple? Well, I went anyways. Met Sephirah just outside of it. Lovely person. Btw, I am now accused of stealing from the lands. I didn't and I resent being called a liar. Just thought I would tell you the straight of it. Sephirah never did say what I had in my hands, for they were empty when I visited the Tribunal city and empty when I jumped to Leader.

    The Light in Your Darkest Hour

    Sagewoman

    Edited for better clarification of what city.


    Can someone please tell me why my comment is negative marked? A curse upon you for doing so!
  20. Upvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Tarquinus in The Beginning To...a Quest?   
    Hello O Dark and Accursed Leader of the Caretakers!

    Remember you telling me NOT to go to the temple? Well, I went anyways. Met Sephirah just outside of it. Lovely person. Btw, I am now accused of stealing from the lands. I didn't and I resent being called a liar. Just thought I would tell you the straight of it. Sephirah never did say what I had in my hands, for they were empty when I visited the Tribunal city and empty when I jumped to Leader.

    The Light in Your Darkest Hour

    Sagewoman

    Edited for better clarification of what city.


    Can someone please tell me why my comment is negative marked? A curse upon you for doing so!
  21. Downvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Darigan in The Beginning To...a Quest?   
    Hello O Dark and Accursed Leader of the Caretakers!

    Remember you telling me NOT to go to the temple? Well, I went anyways. Met Sephirah just outside of it. Lovely person. Btw, I am now accused of stealing from the lands. I didn't and I resent being called a liar. Just thought I would tell you the straight of it. Sephirah never did say what I had in my hands, for they were empty when I visited the Tribunal city and empty when I jumped to Leader.

    The Light in Your Darkest Hour

    Sagewoman

    Edited for better clarification of what city.


    Can someone please tell me why my comment is negative marked? A curse upon you for doing so!
  22. Downvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Pipstickz in The Beginning To...a Quest?   
    Hello O Dark and Accursed Leader of the Caretakers!

    Remember you telling me NOT to go to the temple? Well, I went anyways. Met Sephirah just outside of it. Lovely person. Btw, I am now accused of stealing from the lands. I didn't and I resent being called a liar. Just thought I would tell you the straight of it. Sephirah never did say what I had in my hands, for they were empty when I visited the Tribunal city and empty when I jumped to Leader.

    The Light in Your Darkest Hour

    Sagewoman

    Edited for better clarification of what city.


    Can someone please tell me why my comment is negative marked? A curse upon you for doing so!
  23. Upvote
    SageWoman reacted to Thanatopic in Petition Against February   
    [quote name='zeTsu grass' timestamp='1282926436' post='67174']
    oh my.. i noticed your posts are somehow selfish.. and one-sided..
    . they all say he's "not an mp3" mp3.. and they keep airing senseless ideas..
    feb has done no wrong.. and still you insist he has done something wrong.. he has attained great knowledge at mp3.. so what? it's never your choice to decide for feb. in fact, he helps mp3s, as he had said. where's the sin in that?
    [/quote]


    I'm pretty sure So far i'm the only one said pretty much what you're quoting, so i'll be the one to reply.

    No, never said he did anything wrong. The man can do whatever he wants. I'm merely saying there are consequences for actions. The mp levels are pretty much intended to be a reflection of personal knowledge, at least as far as I understand them. With his actions, feb has shown that he respects power, but does not respect the wisdom that must necessarily temper that power. He wishes to posses it without consequence. He wishes to grow in power, but not to accept the growth that comes along with that power. If this were in the real world, he would be met by someone who could put him in his place, and that would be the forced evolution i'm referring to.

    Int his world, however, it is difficult ( as far as I understand, i'm no fighter) for this to happen. Therefore, we as a community, are attempting to do what is necessary to help a person grow. He is a child in a man's body ( as far as game mechanics go), as is shown by all the files he attached to the post that caused this outcry. He exhibits power, with no great wisdom. So I believe the wisdom must be impressed upon him, even if it is unwillingly.

    As to the helping of mp3's? I don't care. In my eyes, it bears no relevance to the subject.



    And by the by, it's my choice to do whatever the F*** i want to. Don't even believe otherwise. I'm sure you could retort that it is his prerogative to do the same, the difference? I know theres consequences to that, and every point in my life i've considered and accepted them. It's rare that a negative effect comes to my surprise.

    Does all of this surprise you Feb?
  24. Downvote
    SageWoman got a reaction from Jubaris in The Truth Of The War On Necrovion   
    [quote name='Pipstickz' date='10 October 2009 - 06:07 PM' timestamp='1255216072' post='44332']
    Congratulations, Granos, on being a woman in disguise ^^

    You see, men can't plan things :/

    x3
    [/quote]


    Laughs hysterically and votes positive on your posting. Good one! I am impressed.


    [color="#0000FF"]Laughs hysterically while giving Sagewoman a nice little warning (no status alter though) for unnecessary spam.
    DST[/color]
  25. Upvote
    SageWoman reacted to Bronzometh in Personal Heads Accusation From Wolfs   
    quote from Trophy Heads contest statistics: "any strategy is allowed"
    that being said, I guess there is no way to cheat, because everything is allowed.

    winning 1st place in a HC takes allot of training, collecting powerful crits, eventually token them. But it takes time to achieve that. Some ppl don't participate in this contest until they know they can win 1st place, because, since a character is allowed to get a prize only once, some ppl wants the 1st prize at any cost. So, most likely, there will always be a veteran to win 1st place in a HC, because that veteran did not participate in any HC, and he was waiting for the right moment. For MP4, it seems that it's Zleiphneir's turn to win 1st place.

    so, @ wolfs and others who might accuse, instead of accusing veterans for cheating, better get 2-4th place, which is not very hard (there will be no veteran competing for those places), or become a veteran yourself, and wait for your time to win 1st place.
×
×
  • Create New...