Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/12/2010 in all areas

  1. 2 points
    Chewett

    Dst

    I purposely didnt post on the forum that we demoted you because i would have thought that would have ruined your reputation more. But if you dont mind i shall post why we removed you here and now. Here is the story on that front. Then i shall comment on other such things. This is directly copied from the post i made in the moderator section about fenrir. With no omissions, the comments made are my own initial ones and are only the first post. I will not post what moderators posted after for it was Chatham House Rules. They can post if they wish to. [b]Closing topics without reason:[/b] This is about one specific topic. I received a complaint from a user that Fenrir was moderating his topic unfairly. So i investigated and cleared the topic up. here is what i found in that topic. After The user bumped the topic, where the last post was around a week old, he posted. [quote]Please do not spam your own topic. Use the edit function.[/quote] Now i dont believe there was anything wrong, and it was just a plain bump. Considers some users bump topics daily... Then after a different user asked the question and the person who complained replied he posted: [quote]Stop spamming topics to get them active again. If people want any of your creatures, they will use the Search Function and find all the topics related to that criteria. I am closing this topic, as it has no need to be open.[/quote] I was uneasy with this on multiple levels. Firstly he was merely answering a question, something about accepting silver or something (since it wasnt stated in the post) Also, in this section, all the closed topics are finished, which would mean it would likely be forgotten. Overall, i felt this was just fenrir being a little too officious. But after talking with the user it seems that Fenrir didnt like him because he didnt sell his shade to fenrir. When i asked his if this was the case fenrir said it was most not and that he didnt want a "alt abusers shade" and then proceeded to rant about how the user was an alt abuser and it was against his morals. Which made me believe that it was more likely he closed it because he didnt like the user. [b]Reposting Someones WTB offer:[/b] He reposted someones entire "WTB several crits" post, and even left the title of the post the same. More than that, he also then edited his post when the original user edited his. To me this is something that is just plain rude and not something a Section Mod should do. [b]Thread Hi-jacking:[/b] [quote] I am offering any/all my creatures for the Hidden Creatures as well. If you don't like xxxxx offer. PM me. ;D[/quote] As a moderator he has deleted such posts, but here he makes them, I removed it but i dont think that moderators should be hijacking threads when he deletes posts of other people that do that. [b]MD Auction:[/b] He removed a tonn of posts from it and then posted under it: [quote]I have gone through the thread and deleted posts with no value(Ie offering to delete your stats for a creature), and I will continue to do so when I see other offers such as 1 silver for the Dark IV.[/quote] While he has every right to do this, and was probably helping. We all know that any topics that Mur is organising should not be changed in any way. Removing posts may also be considered an abuse of power as he may have removed posts from people he didnt like (i didnt check before remerging it) Mur posted two posts above that he was unsure what to do, whether to delete low bids, or something else. From this i would have hoped he would have left it until Mur had decided. As you can see there are the reasons we demoted him, amoung others such as general attutuide, And the investigation into his moderatorship started a couple days *BEFORE* the argument with Dmik in GGG. This investigation was made after several people complained how he was running the section. And i shall just quote one small section of the pm i sent to him. "If you wish to see a collection of posts and comments on them, you can ask for them, for it is not fair to know what we have judged you on, But i will ofc remove the names, under Chatham House Rules." If you want to discuss this. Then as i told you, there are many ways that you can discuss your demotion. But unless you want to make another topic, your demotion is nothing to do with your problem about dst. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [b]Now lets look at your post[/b] [quote]For as long as I can remember, dst has been just as much a nuisance to the general MD public as certain other individuals. The names Death Ray, and redneck come to mind. She may not be a nuisance in the same way, but she is still a nuisance none the less. I use the word nuisance as a kind substitute for other words which could be applied.[/quote] What "nuisance" are you referring to? do you mean she does things you dont like? Please be more specific [quote]I would like to bring to light her constant hunting of "prey". Those she considers weak, stupid, or different. For no other apparent reason other than for her own self satisfaction that she is better than others. Whether or not she is, is up for debate. Not only does she hunt these "prey" she chomps down on their hind quarters until they can do nothing but limp on for months. If they are so lucky as to be able to walk after the initial attacks, she then sinks her teeth into their throats. For instance, her attacks on Shoeps. I do not care what he did, or why she attacks him constantly, but it is not acceptable to see these instances brought up every few weeks when she can't find another prey to attack. [/quote] How little you know. If you knew anything about this issue you would know that both of them are equally to blame. Dst is angry at shoeps so she berates him. shoeps is angry at dst so he swears at her. Please dont assume that because you dont know what happened, means it doesnt matter. You are taking it massively out of context. And, when was the last time you have seen her bitching about Shoeps? Every couple of weeks? have you even been playing the last few months, Shoeps stopped playing so it seems a miracle that she has been attacking him. [quote]She made it her life's ambition to see his game life ruined, and unfortunately, it appears as if she succeeded. That may or may not be the case, but the fact remains that her goal was to make Shoeps hated by the general population by making a personal conflict public because she could not win otherwise. Again, unacceptable. He is not the only one she constantly harasses. I have a list of people she makes regular attacks against, and it isn't right. [/quote] May i see the list? will you publish it? And again, since you know nothing of Shoeps and dst do not make general comments that show your ignorance of that topic. Find another more apt argument that fits. [quote]Her attitude towards anyone that does anything but tread lightly around her is deplorable. If you so much as argue with her, she will call you a coward. If you so much as win, watch out, for you will be put on her "black list". [/quote] Now im getting worried, im probably going to be on her blacklist because i said its half her fault, you know what? i dont care because she is merely one person. I dislike a few poeple in MD, but since its a GAME they cannot do anything to hurt me. And if you are a insulted by her calling you a "coward" then she has won, and you are letting her have her saticfaction. [quote]I had recently posted something about her comments of calling an individual a coward on the forum. What happened? She deleted and removed the post because she found it "insulting". As well as threatened to have my warn level increased to the point that I will have a Moderator review everything I post. [/quote] oh, i see, you mean this post you made? [quote]Speaking of cowardice, dst. You have the bravery to sit behind your computer in a warm comfy home and call others cowards. Have you ever been fired upon by others who wish you dead? How about fight for your life while several people decide whether or not they should kill you? You are nothing but a cynical woman. The is another word for it, but I already know you will ban me or something out of anger(like usual). Deal with your problems, stop projecting them onto others. Oh, and You would not have the testicular fortitude to do any of those things, let alone say that to my face. So basically, keep your yap shut for once.[/quote] It was made on the Topic of what is "sexually explicit". And your post was rude and offtopic. that is why it was deleted. And again, if you had an issue with that, you could have brought it up. Not kept it as "blackmail" material as it seems you have now. [quote]I believe dst is once again at hand. The night prior, I was having a heated debate with Dmik King(If forget exactly what the initial topic was about but towards the end Dmik King was claiming I was claiming the Holocaust did not happen... when I wasn't talking about it. Tried clarifying it but he would not listen because he was so angry.) and a few others. [/quote] i was there fenrir and your ideas were clouded, and it did seem like you were claiming that, So i am not surprised that Dmik thought you were saying that. Although i hoped you weren't. [quote]And as an attempt to attack me once again, she decided that I was no longer fit to moderate the CTC Section. (I really don't care if I am the CTC Mod or not. It does not bother me.) So, dst and Chewett, notified me several days ago that I was demoted for reasons still unclear. [/quote] As i have said in the pm i sent you, and i will publish it if you wish to portray that i was not crystal clear that if you didnt understand i could send you infomation if you required it. I also did send you what you asked for, but you didnt even bother replying. again, i will requote part of the pm i sent you [b]"If you wish to see a collection of posts and comments on them, you can ask for them, for it is not fair to know what we have judged you on, But i will ofc remove the names, under Chatham House Rules."[/b] You did not ask for them, so if you were unclear then it was your fautl for not asking for them [quote]I am here to call dst out. Make a valid arguement. Do not spew insults and insinuations. Make valid arguements as to why you seem fit to do this. Anyone else is welcome to comment on it, after dst has responded. [Mods: Please notice that there isnt a single insulting word, swear word, and this is not a heated response to something she did recently. I let a few days pass before I decided to write this so I could write it without being rash.][/quote] And as i said in my pm to you, You can post what you want as long as it complies with the rules, However the lies you have posted need massive corrections.
  2. 2 points
    [quote name='Firsanthalas' date='10 January 2010 - 02:02 PM' timestamp='1263153767' post='52451'] The problem as I see it is simply this. We all have different morals and beliefs. In some societies and religions women don't go out in public unless covered head to toe. Yet in MD such restrictions don't exist. To some people the naked form is obscene and pornographic, yet some of the greatest paintings involve nudity and indeed some MD avatars even portray nudity. Its pretty much impossible to define what is sexual behaviour beyond perhaps the actual act itself. Kissing for example was mentioned. Personally I wouldn't find kissing as sexual. Infact people kiss in public in my country all the time. Its not against the law here. Granted it might be in other countries, but it aint here. Holding hands is also done and not against the law, although I believe it is frowned upon if not outright forbidden for a man and woman to do so in public in some countries. Oddly enough its ok for men to do it on the basis that men are just being friends. I guess if you happen to be gay in such a place you have one over on all the hetrosexuals Anyway, there is now a place where people can go to be 'intimate' or indeed just go to have a chat privately. You shouldn't automatically assume that people using such a service are using it for anything naughty either. So can we just drop this topic and move on please? There are plenty of other things we can complain about in RP anyway. Like bad language spammers and people that are immune to everything and the people that can fire lightning bolts from their rear end, not to mention the people that don't like muffins! Seriously, whats up with that? [/quote] A major reason why I think that the sexually explict thing got way out of hand is because of the many cultural influences that exist in MD. For example, I don't find sexual content offensive simply because I find many forms of sex beautiful. I find nudity to be a beautiful thing that displays freedom of an individual and I more often than not do not care if I'm nude in the same room with someone. (Unless it bothers said person.) You can call me morally damaged or a negative influence if you want, but I do romantic role play, and yes.. it IS role play, and I am not ashamed of it at all, I have no reason to be. I find it to be a beautiful expression of emotion, fictional or otherwise, and it doesn't bother me in the least to do it unless the other person involved takes it a step too far and breaks character. Its sickening when I see two people doing such role play when its very obviously clear that they can't distinguish between what is real and what is not. I'm going to admit that I've done this kind of role play before in my younger years, but not in a very long time. I will make an effort to keep it out of the game, because again.. there are many influences in MD and some things, no matter what age, simply offend people. Complications can arise in many different ways from sexual content in general. (The rape fiasco is an example of what happens when another person is deeply offended from this type of thing.) The subject is sensitive to some, so yes. Agreed, it should have been kept from the game a long time ago, and in many ways I'm glad that it is now, however once again I would be lying if I said I was entirely pleased with the events that lead up to the banning of such role play from MD. Thats my two cents, we can close the topic now if anyone wants to do it.
  3. 1 point
    No one

    Dst

    [quote name='Fenrir Greycloth' date='13 January 2010 - 12:33 AM' timestamp='1263335588' post='52585'] For instance, her attacks on Shoeps. I do not care what he did, or why she attacks him constantly, but it is not acceptable to see these instances brought up every few weeks when she can't find another prey to attack. [/quote] You should not interfere in a conflict if you don't know the reasons. On this conflict (as you are/were a moderator) you should already know a few things but ... you lack that intel. Please read more on this theme and then drop it as it is not your problem. [quote name='Fenrir Greycloth' date='13 January 2010 - 12:33 AM' timestamp='1263335588' post='52585'] She made it her life's ambition to see his game life ruined, and unfortunately, it appears as if she succeeded. That may or may not be the case, but the fact remains that her goal was to make Shoeps hated by the general population by making a personal conflict public because she could not win otherwise. Again, unacceptable. He is not the only one she constantly harasses. I have a list of people she makes regular attacks against, and it isn't right. [/quote] Congratulation, you finally found the RP role for her: huntress. Lets admit it: she is GOOOD at hunting, but she still has some problems with the kill. [quote name='Fenrir Greycloth' date='13 January 2010 - 12:33 AM' timestamp='1263335588' post='52585'] Her attitude towards anyone that does anything but tread lightly around her is deplorable. If you so much as argue with her, she will call you a coward. If you so much as win, watch out, for you will be put on her "black list". I had recently posted something about her comments of calling an individual a coward on the forum. What happened? She deleted and removed the post because she found it "insulting". As well as threatened to have my warn level increased to the point that I will have a Moderator review everything I post. I was also demoted from my job of being a Section Moderator for the CTC Section. The reason being? I closed topics that were inactive, and merging posts without notifying the poster when they were spamming their topic with bumps. Why is this a reason for demotion when I had been faithfully maintaining the most active section in the forum for nearly 8 months? [/quote] I guess that dst has an activity of more then 8 months and was more active then most moderators. As for the reasons of what she did ... you should consult the rules of MD mods and also with Chewett (that I know is very impartial). Posting this on a topic ... in my opinion ... shows your luck of judgement. (sorry) [quote name='Fenrir Greycloth' date='13 January 2010 - 12:33 AM' timestamp='1263335588' post='52585'] I believe dst is once again at hand. The night prior, I was having a heated debate with Dmik King(If forget exactly what the initial topic was about but towards the end Dmik King was claiming I was claiming the Holocaust did not happen... when I wasn't talking about it. Tried clarifying it but he would not listen because he was so angry.) and a few others. Dst intervened and started her usual act of trying to prove herself superior to others. I, in no way, claim that I am better, nor worse. When her arguments were being questioned, she resorted to her childish behavior of name calling and dismissing my questions about her arguement as being "stupid". [/quote] Fenrir, i'm sorry that none of your so called "friends" told you already: first impressions die hard and you did a hell of an impression as being ... (oh well) "stupid". Its your fault and yours alone. As a suggestion: try to be more calm and to reread you posts twice and to pospone them for next day to see if they are still appropriate or not. [quote name='Fenrir Greycloth' date='13 January 2010 - 12:33 AM' timestamp='1263335588' post='52585'] And as an attempt to attack me once again, she decided that I was no longer fit to moderate the CTC Section. (I really don't care if I am the CTC Mod or not. It does not bother me.) So, dst and Chewett, notified me several days ago that I was demoted for reasons still unclear. I am here to call dst out. Make a valid arguement. Do not spew insults and insinuations. Make valid arguements as to why you seem fit to do this. [/quote] Fenrir, from my experience, any personal problem must be solved in person (or at least tried) then you can escalate but still keep it private. Anyway, I like your post, if there will be a "most amusing topic" I will vote for you. If I offended you ... I'm sorry. Otherwise ... i'm in a good mood today (that is why I reply). If I offended someone ... please tell me and I will apologize.
  4. 1 point
    Pipstickz

    Dst

    Fenrir, I believe you're someone who believes in speaking the truth, as you see it, no matter what others do or say? Why should dst be any different? More importantly, what's to be gained from making this topic?
  5. 1 point
    Tarquinus

    Historic Win

    Intelligence is absolutely critical to a successful campaign. If I have any complaint about the Loreroot forces' efforts, it is only that we were not positively deluging each other with intelligence - status reports, disposition of enemy forces, etc. No: not all need fight, and strategically speaking, many [u]should[/u] not. But the less glamorous task of lookouts and other auxiliaries should not be undervalued at all!
  6. 1 point
    Jubaris

    Historic Win

    never was the score so high in the torches, Loreroot achieved outstanding results, congratulations brothers and sisters but it isn't just the won competition that is important, the most important thing here is that we all show unity, Savelites helping Guardians, Guardians helping CoE, and in circles, I applaud, and I must say I am very proud of you all, and I had to share this with you all Loreroot Eternal! Praised be Savelfuser! Praised be Goddess of the Moon! Praised be King Firsanthalas! Strength through Unity!
  7. 1 point
    LadyDawn

    What Is Considered "sexually Explict"?

    [quote name='Muratus del Mur' date='10 January 2010 - 12:50 PM' timestamp='1263127801' post='52408'] I can't help to tell this Tarq...woman are guilty for all bad things man do :D:D (for the good things too, but for the point here i will ignore that:P). [/quote] We are yes. [quote name='Muratus del Mur' date='10 January 2010 - 12:50 PM' timestamp='1263127801' post='52408'] Indeed i noticed compared to other games that MD has a huge feminine population. Most games are played by 80% guys and 15% woman (where is 5%, guess). In MD, i don't have stats for sure but i believe woman population is HUGE. Not sure what made them register or stay more .. interesting. [/quote] The 5% are from 6th planet in 10th galaxy etc. Kidding... Probably 5% are those inbetween. But personaly I registered because I was eager to try something new and different. I stayed because I like what I see. Thats for short. [quote name='Muratus del Mur' date='10 January 2010 - 12:50 PM' timestamp='1263127801' post='52408'] Years ago I had in mind something that now maybe will be done. A room, where the people inside have no name, nobody knows who is who..something like Player1 Player2 instead of their names. Chat would be tottaly private, no records. I was thinking it to be called the madhouse, a place where you can say anything, at all, without fearing the other person will use it against you later. Some need to talk, some need to listen. For example i talk with the taxi drivers about stuff i dont talk with friends, because i know that taxidriver will not remember me, will not judge me, will just listen and share an opinion. Its amazing how usefull it is to put my thoughts in order. [/quote] That is a very good idea, in my humble opinion. Maybe that way things could be wented out on that specific place and thus improving the overal mood. Anyhow, I think I would actual use it to rant and thus later play my "wanna-be-good and kind and sweet" char better, ha!... [quote name='Muratus del Mur' date='10 January 2010 - 12:50 PM' timestamp='1263127801' post='52408'] I can't wait to explore a bit more the possibilities behind usable items. :D I allready have in mind how to create professions!! It can be also used to combine items, like raw materials into something else, or to give you ap,vp,ve, or anything else once a day, ..there are endless options. This feature is as important as the spells, trust me. Also limited cast spells can be assigned to items, so you could have like magic tomes that will allow you to cast a spell, but once you give away that book you will no longer have it. I am not sure yet how abusable it is yet. I think the next kind of item will be something like a healing stone, that will recharge your cretures (ALL)but just once every 4 days or so. [/quote] To all this I have to say a YEY! And I will add that majority of people probably stay because you are actualy making changes, talking about your ideas and so on. It shows that you care for the "game" and thus we care also (well, ok, I can not speak for everybody obviously). Think about is as a projection in psychology. [quote name='Muratus del Mur' date='10 January 2010 - 12:50 PM' timestamp='1263127801' post='52408'] I talk again too much and think of too many things at once , arggg.... [/quote] No you dont, and no you dont. (You would have to be a woman for that )
  8. 1 point
    Jubaris

    Historic Win

    with my first line, I was reffering to the opposing side, that they should defend the land from that sort of activity. I didn't understood this as you picking on me I understand what you're saying, and yes you're right, it's not fair it's cheating, but we aren't the only one, like you said, every land is doing it (or at least something like that), and it seems fair doesn't win in this game. this topic was meant for Lorerootians (thats why it is in Lorerootian section), to make them understand (if they don't know already) what they manage to do, and if we keep like this (generally, I don't mean the cheating part ) we can prosper. I apologize I made all this, when the torch like a competition started, I thought as much as you that this behavior is cheating and didn't want to do it (you can ask certain people to prove), but in time I figured that behavior is part of the game, cause if it isn't Mur would try to restrict it somehow (this was so obvious from the start, so don't say its bug abusing)
  9. 1 point
    Jubaris

    Historic Win

    first, Torch should express land's ability to defend themselves and invade others, so when defending your land, you should keep an eye for all intruders for all time. It wasn't only Loreroot to do it, you have mixed up things, we weren't doing anything in Necrovion, that was GG forces, and I have proof for that, just to keep things clear. I didn't wanted to taunt all of the others for losing the torches, far from it, I wanted to express my feelings cause Loreroot showed unity after a long time, evolving all those silly little issues among ourselves.
  10. 1 point
    LadyDawn

    Creative Punishment

    First of all, this system propsed here could be easly abused. How? You dont like how someone is behaving, you report it, you make sure that you are in good relationships with jury, judge and hey, even a lawyer etc. and i predict this or similar [b]will happen[/b] in course of time. Why? That is simple, because human being is manipulative and may it pretend to be "oh-so-good-and-honest" it will [b]always[/b] look for its best interest, may it be the game or rl. Look just at how much [b]injustice[/b] is happening in rl trials. Does anybody want to be taken responsible to bring that in here also? I think that there is a lot of people here that would love to have a chance and get a seat in jury, they might not admit it aloud or maybe even not to themself, but they are. The second thing is, that there is no objectivity even if you try to reach it. You have feelings and with having them, pof, the objectivity transforms into holy smoke. You hear this, you hear that, you read this, you read that and voila, you form an opinion. You might think it is based on facts but in reality is not. You will lean to the side that "suits you best". The third thing... You would take away from people to have characters that they want to have and that is repression. Yes, again something that we realy dont like in rl, right, well at least if we are not the ones that get repressed, if it is other way around some would or care less or even be those who repress. I understand that some characters in game might annoy you, make you mad and so on but at same time some other people might like them for what they are. And again... do you want to play in a sandbox where only those who behave to your standards exist or would you like to chalenge yourself and try to co-exists, maybe even see them "oh-that-so-popular-light" in non-repressing manner? I would prefer the second. So how to solve this? Quite easy actualy... If someone is "rp-raped", well, we do have jail and if the prof exists great, send it there but dont let him/her rot away. "Hire" some prison guards, offer psychologist to find the problem in that specific character etc. Or lets say the "rp-smootching" that sisterhood does... Some of people out there dont like it (sorry "sisters") and if someone doesnt want to be "rp-smooched" and he is... well, then the person that "rp-smootched" him did also sexual offence! What about that, eh? Since "rp-rape" is not allowed (I am NOT tolerating it and am against it also, before you get confused) then this should be dealed with also, or are we looking only in one side. It is obvious example of duality. And now, since none of "you" pointed this out, do you realy think that any of you would be suitable for being a jury or a judge? I dont think so, sorry. If someones char is mentaly ill, hey, put up a real sanatory with so-called medical staff to take care for that char. I bet there are some of us out there that are interested in psychology, not necesseraly by occupation, and would find "fun" with trying to handle the situation. I am not blaming or pointing out at anybody in here, I am meerly using this as an example. But again, I dont believe that could be done withing comunity itself and Mur would have to step in probably. Anyhow, that is my opinion on the matter. Thank you. Edited for the second time to add this: I am talking here in general, I am not pointing fingers at anybody and I hope you can deal with it even if you dont agree with what I have just written.
  11. 1 point
    (Zl-eye-f)-nea

    The Sisterhood

    Chastise me all you want but aside from Dst's wet armour competition I haven't seen anyone else come up with any marketing strategies or activities, and they could go to war dressed in bras, I never mentionned dresses...what about Xena warrior princess? Im sure she had some kind of Bra, and what about the character "worth about a pig" in Gladiatress, she bought a Bra from the Gauls. Fine, if there is to be no Bra burning then how about blowing up David Lloyd George's hou....I mean what about blowing up the house of one of the king or queens...a hunger strike...chain yourselves to the howling gates...have riot in MDP... Z
  12. 1 point
    (Zl-eye-f)-nea

    The Sisterhood

    But back on topic, Windy, I have a VERY wonderful suggestion. A suggestion so marvelous, so stupendous, so inspired that not to do it would be a travesty so great as to wipe the very flesh from ths bones of the earth. I suggest, all the women of the sisterhood burn their bras. Z
  13. 1 point
    Sorry, I have two things that are noteworthy to say. First to a mini-response to Kyphis' post, and is more directed to Yrth: Nuetrality or not... I can't let GG bleed like this... if I have to I will let Grido in as long as I have the ability to do so... Yrth I'm sorry, but it's because I'm faithful to GG... and I will continue to press for him to get his access back. As for my second part, this goes to someone who was rated with a vote weight of 9 (hmmm) and I wanted to express my discontent with one line in particular, because it is completely unfounded, and I wanna set this person's stigma straight. [quote]as far as this line goes "About Cryxus (not to mention about inacitvity) should i start and explain why a pirate should never be a king ? \r\n\r\n I think i should end here"[/quote] I can understand the inactivity part, although I was only gone a month a while back and have came back at least every few days, though I was busy studying for a job in healthcare industry as well as dealing with family issues... but no matter... I digress... I have to ask... did you even read what I said? because I don't recall saying I wanted to be king... I said I would run in the election and lord over GG with the consult of advisors, etc... but I suppose it is kinda difficult to pick that out despite the fact that i expressly stated that several times over in this forum... As far as why a pirate shouldn't be in a place of power... why is that? I mean obviously you get that from a magical world that doesn't parallel real life at all where pirates are only ever pirates, and cannot do more than that... I mean there has never been a pirate in an influencial position like pope before... oh wait... that's right... there was. It wouldn't have been uncommon for pirates to become privateers, then move on to influencial positions such as governors.. In fact one such pirate went by the name of Henry Morgan... but I suppose that one cannot make distinctions with such heavy prejudices... I seriously suggest you do your homework before you speak, even if you think it'll be private, because if you seriously thought that line held water... think again. ~Captain Cryxus X'hal Pirate, and damn proud of it
  14. 1 point
    BUT, from my point of view, RPCs are (should be, whatever) equal. Their roles may decide their position over each other in RP, but one RPC shouldn't be able to say "I don't like what you did, so I'm punishing you by taking your spells/screwing you over in heads contest with heads control/sticking you in a dream when I know you need to be somewhere/etc." I really can't help it if that's my opinion...and I can see that it's pointless to try and persuade you that mine is the right one, which is may or may not be, but whatever x3
  15. 1 point
    [quote name='awiiya' date='30 September 2009 - 09:05 PM' timestamp='1254366347' post='43311'] And Pip: When was this a matter of people? They are great people, minus the titles, I'm sure. If this were a matter of who is a good or bad person, then the result would be different. So I don't see how your point makes any sense. Yrthilian's status as a person was never called into question, nor was Grido's. Grido isn't asking Yrthilian to be disposed as a person. [/quote] Because it brings people like you who bring up definitions of the word, which is not what this is about. This isn't your English king, this is MD. And to Rendril: Lots of things are based on public opinion in MD. Lifeline's banned accounts (In my opinion, a slightly less blown-up, but bigger issue than this) were decided by vote, new features are decided by vote...Mur wants his players happy and entertained xD
  16. 1 point
    Thank you. That is a workable definition of kingship. Ironically, we do not, in the main, disagree. I felt it necessary to call you to account for historical references, which I think have little place in MagicDuel, because your voice, whether you realise it or not, is loud and influential. I can see my error in conflating your English-monarchy reference to the rest of your post. I refer to the KO merely as the pre-eminent researchers and, to my knowledge, the only sanctioned scholars in this realm. I have long wanted to know more about the gods of MagicDuel, and my search has turned a moebius twist on itself, leading me to conclude, as I have in "real life", that there are no gods at all. Referring to your membership in the Order seems like a cheap shot, reading it over, and I apologise.
  17. 1 point
    Actually the king must be removed during, or prior to a new leader being seated... it would be awkward having 2 kings of GG or something of the sort. Who is to say a king can't be removed? I suppose one could be king of nothing, and nobody, but that's hardly a king. Again, I'm not for any side in this debate, but if the people do not follow their king, and do as they please without regard to him it can hardly be said he is king, save for in title alone.
  18. 1 point
    Pample, for clarification I never said I wanted a king either... I merely want what is best for the land. If people think MB is best suited to be ruler, so be it, if it's someone else, so be it, if it's nobody, then so be it... The people of Golemus, however, should be united to protect, and, dare i say, better our land.
  19. 1 point
    Pample, just for clarifications, not saying that what grido did didnt show gall, but I think that yrth had already done his worst, I doubt there were any punches pulled when it came to his being banned from GG, so really I feel MB is putting much more on the line. Does that make Grido any less qualified to lead? no. It seems to me, however, that he is already backing MB in his bid for canidacy, but lets not make actions seem more glorious than they are, Grido was pissed, justifiably so, and he felt there was need for retaliation, in my eyes it was no hero's call, though Grido has done plenty of worthy deeds in my eyes for a bid at canidacy as well, though I would hate to see him stretched too thin to perform any other duties he has.
  20. 1 point
    This is concerning the dissenting party, though I certainly still feel that both sides are going about this the wrong way. I must express my distaste at the anonimity the this "backer" is still clinging to. If (s)he wishes to see yrth overthrown, step forth, voice your complaints, or please sit back and let others handle it, as they seem to be without your aid for all I know. Those who cannot stand and fight for what they believe in shouldn't expect others to do it for them. Be prepared to lead by example, or be prepared not to have the backing of others who see weakness in your character for letting others fight your battles for you. I understand your reasons, but I do not respect them. A leader should be cautious, but when the time is right he must not show weakness. As for Yrth, asking someone to attack a friend, and then punishing them for not doing it is more than a bit harsh, as king you should be thinking of the backlash this may create. Keeping the loyalty and faith of your subjects should be among the top priorities of a king. Both sides... please, I implore you to think on your actions a bit more, as stop being so selfish. The last thing GG needs is a selfish king to tarnish it's good name, which hasn't happened yet, but if the course continues it may just be the case. I am posting this as advice, take it or leave it. ~Cryxus
  21. 0 points
    Pipstickz

    Dst

    You keep bringing up your mod demotion, so I'll try and clarify: People complained about you, you're the only one complaining about dst (as far as I know, it's just a guess) Second, sarcasm in writing just doesn't work. Third, I believe Chewett means that Shoeps doesn't play as actively as before, or maybe just that he isn't GM anymore.
  22. 0 points
    Fenrir Greycloth

    Dst

    It is a longshot, Pip. But I want her to change, because I am tired of her harassing people. It can't go on.
  23. 0 points
    Pipstickz

    Dst

    Fenrir, that's like asking Chewett to stop posting on the forums, or asking Peace to stop being...Necro-y. It's what she does, and it's her choice, so unless you have a way to MAKE her do something (ie. give a valid reason other than "dst is mean to people she doesn't like"), you aren't going to get anywhere.
  24. 0 points
    Fenrir Greycloth

    The Meaning Of Life.

    I am of the belief that we have no "purpose" but to live, breed, and die. What we do in between is our own personal purpose, but in the grand scheme of things, our lives are meaningless. There are those of us who rise above the rest and have a purpose, who can change the world with a real purpose. While this is not a very heartening purpose if you look at it that we are insignificant, and are leading meaningless lives, you must be able to understand that what the Grand Scheme perceives as meaningless and what we find meaningful are two complete opposites. I cope with this reality by doing something meaningful to others. I may not be able to change the lives of the entire world, but I can change the lives of a couple hundred(may be a long shot or and a shortshot, my life has only started. ). All in all, it does not matter if your life has meaning, it is whether or not you give it meaning.
  25. 0 points
    My superpowers: 1. Invincibility (that is an honest to god Super power.) 2. Super Strength 3. Super Speed I would find superman and kill him and become resident bad *** in the world. Then I would take it upon myself to do the extreme (Kidnap the president for kicks, roundhouse kick Chuck Norris, kick George Bush in the gonads... the list goes on.)
  26. -1 points
    Hm. I am just a simple fighter, of no big importance. But if you ask me, there is no king of golemus. Titles in general mean nothing, or little at all to me. As such, I can only say that I do not support yrthilian, however I do not supposed the so called new king either, because he's not revealing himself. As for Grido: I see why he banned you, Grido, however that was harsh. His own choice to declare war led to the current fiasko (yes, it's that to me), and letting it out on subordinates isn't exactly the best way to go, only cutting down on what he has. And speaking of kingship..having a crown will stay a crown, although it can turn out to be an exiled king. Honestly, the way he is doing it I wonder just how much more damage there will be until this war finally ends. As for yrthilian: Now go, ban me as well if you want for voicing this. Not like I actually have access to Golemus anyways, like Grido used to. However I agree with Cryxus here: Don't mistake your own power too much, for every person is mortal in the end, even if ending it is a sin in itself. Do not blame me if I step aside if you do not trust me; I defended at the Stone of Twisted Souls for you because it is my duty as a Golemian, not because it was my will, as I declared neutrality. As for the so called new king: As long as you lurk in the shadows you are not fit to be one. I will not support this.
  27. -1 points
    Well, the powerful backer is no longer anonymous. It’s me. I remained anonymous in the start because I wanted to get support first and a solid place to start from. I wanted to know what other people thought first. Now I do. If you think that doing this anonymous from the start was a mistake and it makes me a coward, then that’s your opinion. But the fact that I came forward this soon, should say enough. I have no intention of gaining power without the responsibilities. I do not shirk from them. I supported Yrthilian in the past, because I thought he would be a good leader, perhaps even, better than me. For those who don’t know, after Wodin left, savelfuser, yrthilian and I were the leaders. After savelfuser left I supported yrthilian because at that point, I had little ambition or enthusiasm to help govern the alliance. I was busy being mp6 and RPC back then. That was a long time ago and for a long time I noticed the GG alliance grow, bit by bit. But I also saw it stagnate. I waved them off, these things happen. Then, things suddenly started escalating. GG had fought in two wars in a short amount of time, causing much suffering, not just for the enemies, but for the inhabitants of GG as well. Tales of friendship, /regardless of ingame or irl/ that suffered. Yrthilian allowing KoB to take necrovion slaves. Despite what my really outdated and old description says, I am currently against slavery. I noticed the unjust treatment of Marvolo, son of a very good and legendary friend, Khalazdad. I also noticed that Wodin Ullr was a lifeless and silent husk of what he used to be. A good friend. I then heard from yrthilian himself about ripping the cube apart. I express extreme regret about not having stopped him nor making any attempt at doing so. I was not at the scene at the time, I missed the gate. But having Khalazdad as another lifeless slave cannot be condoned in my opinion. Yrthilian writes this off as a YIM war. You want roleplay? The reasons I gave are roleplay enough. In fact, I do not list as reason the YIM war, what I list as a reason is yrthilian casually dismissing his 2nd in command. What’s that about? Complete and total exile? If you are willing, as a roleplayer, to sacrifice a good man’s innocent soul, the soul of a good friend and father to many, the soul which was given to Wodin in /good trust/, just to reclaim power, then you are not a good and just king. Then you are not my king. Then you are nothing but a man hell bent for power. If you roleplay that, you roleplay a paranoid man. You know me and most of the other active RPC’s know me. I am objective and often neutral. But GG is my homeland and I will not stand by any longer to watch how GG suffers. I am not saying that I would be a good leader. What I am saying is that yrthillian in my eyes, has proven himself to be inadequate as a leader. What about me? I do not wish to be king. Regardless of whether or not I would become king or not, I will first and foremost be Emperor of Bunnies. But the bunnies are inhabitants of GG as well and if GG suffers, then they suffer as well. If I were allowed to lead the alliance, I would do what should have been done. Get peace, concentrate more on the interior, give Wodin his just respect and lay his weak body to rest. I would be far more inclined to call for diplomacy, instead of war. I would keep the foundations of the GG alliance true. Instead of researching many things in my lab somewhere hidden in GG, I would strive to make my alliance to look far more like the MR alliance, which in my opinion is a true fighter’s alliance, like Wodin would have wanted. Before yrthilian became king he was a researcher, a scientist. Tell me, how does a researcher lead a fighter’s alliance? But that is what I would do if I were to gain leadership. My main intent is to make sure that yrthilian does not gain leadership. If someone more suited to the task becomes the leader, then so be it, I do not mind.
  28. -1 points
    [quote name='cryxus' date='27 September 2009 - 07:16 PM' timestamp='1254075379' post='42980'] As for Yrth, asking someone to attack a friend, and then punishing them for not doing it is more than a bit harsh, as king you should be thinking of the backlash this may create. Keeping the loyalty and faith of your subjects should be among the top priorities of a king. ~Cryxus [/quote] Sorry Cryux just to clear that poitn i hate having to go back on my word of not posting. Grido told me of this plan and said he would do it. I did not ask him to do it in the first place. The he backed out of it. RL is suppose to be seperate from in game
  29. -1 points
    Er... What you suggest pretty much implies ignoring the powers of yrth, you know..he issued a royal decree (as disputed that royalty is right now, it's still royalty). And he even formally announced it. Do you think a king should be that light on his words?
  30. -1 points
    [quote name='Shadowseeker' date='30 September 2009 - 07:55 PM' timestamp='1254336912' post='43253'] Er... What you suggest pretty much implies ignoring the powers of yrth, you know..he issued a royal decree (as disputed that royalty is right now, it's still royalty). And he even formally announced it. Do you think a king should be that light on his words? [/quote] Shadowseejer that is for you to decide. what ever way you feel you want.
  31. -1 points
    I somehow doubt yrthilian is a king as in the definition of being a military leader. You shouldn't forget, he was a researcher first, and in terms of combative ability I am rather sure he's not amongst the first 2..3rd is negotiative, because of the powers given. And the issue with a mandate of kingship is..if nobody accepts it, or so little that it has no use in the lands, then it's no real reign, even if he has power. And currently it seems to me that there is little public support from golemians for him.
  32. -1 points
    [quote name='Lifeline' date='01 October 2009 - 04:50 PM' timestamp='1254408640' post='43413'] i find this whole situation laughable. u want to get rid of a king that in ur point of view hasnt served his land correctly in the near past. then please judge the king on what he did. not just on his own land but compared to all other lands. get an impression of all 4 main lands how they were led and if the person in charge did a good job. make an average and if yrth is way below the performance of all the other dispose him. if he did perform just as good as the leaders of the other lands why replace him then? if u want to replace him then u cant just count on the hatred from the war to take him out u will have to state what u try to accomplish and above all do better than yrth. [/quote] Glad you find it humorous. Take an average of the lands? I will and the result is that, yes, Yrthilian has performed badly, duh, why else are we doing this? Have you even read the reasons why (and not just the burning of K and the ousting of Grido one's, there are more). [quote] and btw there was obviously a traitor in the alliance that invited peace in and made this whole situation happen. and now members of the alliance revolt against yrth because of what he did in response to stealing the alliance? could it not be possible that this was done on purpose? make him loose the alliance, hope he acts on revenge later on, and then bring up that he is not fit to rule to take it urself? i mean no offence with this and have no clue who the traitor is i just speak of this being a possibility. so please dont take it for more, i dont want to offend any gg member here with this. [/quote] Again, it's not just that single action, it is the total of all his bad actions together, and if you still don't get it. It's not just his /bad/ actions, it's also his inactivity. Have you seen how many activity days wodin dropped? I have, and while the total measurement of activity days is not a good and accurate measurement, the /lack/ of activity days is. Wodin is an empty and dead, almost hollow character. And it is not just about Wodin. Yrthilian himself spends an amazing time at his lab, researching. Inside the alliance I felt almost no unity, no kinship with anyone, contrary to when Wodin was in charge. There was a decline after wodin left, yes, but the growth that was to come never fully came. And that was under yrthilian's leadership. Compared to the current growth of Necrovion and how Loreroot recouperated after GG had invaded, I find that yrthilian did an inadequate job. [quote] a king cant be taken down by an election dont u agree? a king is a king he decides who gets which statues and job. if u want another status than the king gave u then u have to revolt. especially when u want to title of king then u have to force it. u need to take the king down. there is no election there is a forcefull revolution. think about this again i guess this makes sense to all parties... [/quote] I had hoped I wouldn't have to explain this, because I assumed it was so simple already. Of course holding a mere vote is not enough to oust someone. You would have to get control over the alliance first and guess what? We do. In fact, the military coup is done already, all this vote is doing, is ending this military coup, as it is legitimizing the coup based upon popularity votes. [quote] a revolution has to be thought through well. it has to be very clear who gets the new king title afterwards. otherwise the land will just be in more chaos. a revolution weakens the land greatly. if the revolution army cant even decide on a king themself then the land is doomed and sooner or later another revolution will take place because the last one was obviously not successful and didnt bring structure into the land. now Metal Bunny says: what is this? doesnt sound planned or thought through at all to me. there is no promised structure after the revoltion and disposing of the king. this can just bring more chaos and hurt the land more if there is so little planning being done. this cant be claimed to be for the good of golemus as a land. such an unplanned revolution or whatever it is now will just weaken the land more and more. GG will loose all its respect if its possible to overthrow the land without a new agenda and just more chaos to wait until finally a new leader is elected. [/quote] You want real concrete plans? I have them, but again, I won't post them here because it's off-topic. It creates chaos and ensures a 3 page long off-topic debate and makes it all chaotic. And you need to ask yourself in what status the land is in now, because it's already chaotic. But the moment GG starts recruiting again, and that will be the moment yrthilian is de-throned or stays on the throne, then order will return. You people are putting all of this waaaaay toooo muuuuch into the real life perspective, but that's not possible! Where is death? How does loyalty go into all of this? What about Mur? This is MagicDuel, stop making quite frankly, useless real life analogies. [quote] isnt it said u get what u already have in MD? how can u simply elect people for kingship then by popularity? u have to proof that u have the potential to be a king. u need to be able to stand up against the tyrant and take his status. u have to fight for it and go through with the revolution and then put urself into that position because it was u who managed to take down the old king. it is what proofed that u as a future king can stand up agaist a possible threat. if u just lean back afterwards and run an election u obviously dont have what it takes to be king. and above all u lagged all preparation u just "beheaded" the old king and left the land in chaos afterwards just waiting for something to happen to bring structure back into it. u have to bring that structure urself and nobody else if u want a strong land. [/quote] Potential for king? I know I do. When wodin left, yrthilian, me and savelfuser ruled together and it worked out fine. Then savelfuser went to loreroot and I decided to advise yrthilian, as I was too busy with RPC and mp6. I am the frigging emperor of bunnies, you want potential? I give you the fact that since yrthilian no longer commands GG, is proof enough that potential is not the real issue here, it's proven conduct of the leader in the past. If you want more potential and plans, then once yrthilian is de-throned, I will make a seperate topic and put it all there. All of these questions are not the real issue. And why will I not make this topic now? [i][u]Because I am not arrogant enough to presume to know what Mur wants or will do.[/u][/i] For all I know, Yrthilian will stay king and then that topic will become useless.
  33. -1 points
    dam.. you really deserve a full rest mur.. thats alot to read O.o
  34. -1 points
    This is such a superb example of why democracy is the worst form of government, except all other that have been tried. The people who voted just read the first few lines of the topic, thought to themselves; waitaminute, a king has the right to exile someone; and then just voted based upon that. At half of the votes do I not see the heavier reasons, of which not the exile itself, but the implications of the exile was but a part of. Such as, bad judgement, bad leadership, inactivity, proliferation of the alliance, inactivity of wodin, paranoia in the sense that he was extremely distrusting of others as well as burning a soul, given to wodin in good trust to him, just to regain his power. Exile was just a tiny part of this. Ugh.. and yes, if you haven't noticed by now, this is me, not conceding defeat.
  35. -1 points
    [quote]Like it or not, the decision reached by the voting is FINAL.[/quote] Seems your a little late with all this...
  36. -1 points
    Peace

    Gg Alliance Returned

    I did not make a demand, Liberty. In case you can not read, which you can't in this case, I simply requested for it to return. I have nothing to bargain here. When I took over the GG alliance I did state that I would return it to the former members of Golemus. Whether Yrthilian is to return in the ally is not my concern, but I was very strict in my decision not to hand it back to his hands.
  37. -1 points
    dst

    Debate On Marind Bell Kingship

    One question: who is going to oppose you? You're the only candidate for MB so...
  38. -1 points
    Lifeline

    Debate On Marind Bell Kingship

    KoB wasnt taken over. Lib was forced to leave and Sentinels were invited. currently cless is the leader (who has been in SoE and later in KoB for more than half a year) but yes the alliance cant stay the way it is now. as i said in the initial post there will be changes. and dst as for other candidates who knows lets see. nobody expected Lib to go for kingship of necro as well
  39. -1 points
    Lifeline

    Debate On Marind Bell Kingship

    [quote name='Liberty4life' date='14 October 2009 - 08:56 PM' timestamp='1255546567' post='44681'] i wont go for king of bell thats for sure and no lifeline ya missed something, kob is under necro, and i wasnt forced to leave, it was my own decision, and cless is leader by loyalty but he has to do as necros say, if he doesnt he is then opposing necros which rightfully acquired kob, so ya will have to make diplomatic deal with necros about kob, or second choice is to do it by force (kick necros out of kob) [/quote] ok fine i interpreted the enemy in ur own alliance as u being forced to leave because who would like to stay in the alliance like that. and in my point of view it wasnt taken over. taking over means taking the alliance by becoming new leader. this didnt happen. anyway i am well aware of the little possibilities there are. and as i said the current situation is unacceptable and will be changed one way or the other.
  40. -1 points
    dst

    Debate On Marind Bell Kingship

    So....in case you win basically MB will have 2 kings?
  41. -1 points
    Lifeline

    Debate On Marind Bell Kingship

    alright then u will get a clear answer but u cant expect me to provide all inner politic informations here. the answer: it of course depends on the situation... alliance matters: the king is the king of the land and has a say in alliance matters. however the alliances are a strutured system in itself with its own leader. the leader of the alliance will have the main decision power. the king cant force any policy on an alliance he doesnt lead within the land. military affairs: once KoB is fully established again it will be the militray force of the land as it used to be. how to act in a war will be decided by the king and the alliance leader of KoB. i have seriously trained for 2 month and posses a strong army (creatures, stats, principles, ect). if i think i need to be involved in any war i as a player of magicduel will join the war myself no matter if anybody is against it. i might be a king (if i get elected) but i build my strenght, the only strenght used in that fight, before i became king so i will use it as i think is right. chewett has no say in that matter because its what i owned before becoming king. no member of SoE will have any say in how the land acts during the time of war. why? because they are no fighters and dont participate in the war no matter what. the war is not their business. spectactors shouldnt meddle in the affairs of fighters who risk everything at the front in a fierce battle. KoB isnt where it once was it still suffers from the consequences of the war. i dont know yet who the leader of KoB will be. so i cant tell anybody yet to what kind of arangements we will come. u will have to be statisfied with this explanation. to summarize it quickly: king and KoB leader will have the full saying in how war situations are handled. SoE members can advise on how to react in the war but cant stop the militray from launching. here u go hope u are statisfied now. the king cant force a policy on any alliance he doesnt lead himself. and all military affairs will be handled completely by the king and the leader of KoB
  42. -1 points
    Lifeline

    Debate On Marind Bell Kingship

    Chewett and I have been discussing the kingship for a long time. We have both agreed that for a strong land a united leadership is necessary to give a clear vision and purpose to all citizens. Inner quarrels for power just weaken the land and bring unrest. We both want the best for Marind Bell and therefore will only act in its best interest and as always co-operate. The war has weakened Marind Bell and the alliances need to be restructured and rebuild. This can only be accomplished if we support each other. We have decided that I will candidate for kingship of Marind Bell. We have agreed on the same goal, the same policy, and the same vision. I will candidate for the kingship of Marind Bell with Chewett as council leader helping, supporting and advising me. My main task at first will be to restructure the alliances. Marind Bell alliances will expand. Up until now we only accepted “Seekers” into SoE and strong military players into KoB. KoB will stay the military alliance of Marind Bell and drastic measures will soon be taken to rebuild it. SoE on the other hand will become more player friendly and not just recruit one kind of people. We will have different sections within the alliance open to a wider range of players. There are however several factors that prevent us from making the new policy of SoE public yet. I kindly ask you to be patient and trust into the love Chewett and I have for Marind Bell. Marind Bell will keep its tradition as homeland to all those seeking knowledge and hoping to unfold its secrets. The home of Angiens and a place for all those wishing to understand them better and seeking contact. We will improve on its history by offering new objectives for explorers and fighters alike. This has been all decided before the introduction of kingship. So no matter who becomes king, Chewett and I will stick to what is said above. We will always make efforts to help Marind Bell flourish and pass on its legacy. I am posting this so early because I wish for a debate. I want everybody to be clear about what I have in mind for Marind Bell. If anybody has any questions feel free to ask in this topic.
  43. -1 points
    Fenrir Greycloth

    Historic Win

    Would this be because of the people standing in front of Necrovion and attacking their friends?
  44. -1 points
    Pipstickz

    Historic Win

    Marind Bell too, of course.
  45. -1 points
    Lazarus

    Historic Win

    Cheaters.
  46. -1 points
    Chewett

    Historic Win

    I agree with the unity, But really Rhaegar, i would have thought you had some more honesty. Cheating at something like this, and then posted and shouting in the mood panel about it... I would have thought you were better than that. Obviously i was wrong. Nothing more that a common cheater.
  47. -1 points
    Chewett

    Historic Win

    [quote name='Rhaegar Targaryen' date='10 January 2010 - 10:40 AM' timestamp='1263120045' post='52395'] first, Torch should express land's ability to defend themselves and invade others, so when defending your land, you should keep an eye for all intruders for all time. [/quote] So by abusing this bug you were "defending" the land? [quote name='Rhaegar Targaryen' date='10 January 2010 - 10:40 AM' timestamp='1263120045' post='52395'] It wasn't only Loreroot to do it, you have mixed up things, we weren't doing anything in Necrovion, that was GG forces, and I have proof for that, just to keep things clear. [/quote] I didnt mention you were the only land to do this, im sure every land did something similar. But you were the land to win, and also the one to make a post on this forum like this. [quote name='Rhaegar Targaryen' date='10 January 2010 - 10:40 AM' timestamp='1263120045' post='52395'] I didn't wanted to taunt all of the others for losing the torches, far from it, I wanted to express my feelings cause Loreroot showed unity after a long time, evolving all those silly little issues among ourselves. [/quote] It is great that unity is now achieved, but unity abusing something? is that better? And if you look at the previous posts, it certainly seems that they are not happy for unity. I merely picked on you and you land because you had the pomposity to post something like this. No offence to any of you, but i thought better of you.
  48. -1 points
    dst

    Allow Other People To Edit Your Papers

    Hmm...and who and how will get this? I am cynical about the idea. Why? Because almost 1 year ago certain someone deleted my papers cause he had an issue with what I was writing in them. What if the situation re-occurs?
  49. -1 points
    Liberty4life

    Gazebo Of Victory

    chew not true, if ya get vict it doesnt necessarily means other dude will get defeat [quote] # ~~VICTORIOUS~~ (win+1) This type of outcome happens when both players lose at least 10% vitality and the difference between both oponents is at least 30%. The win gets counted with the win/loss ballance. # ~~DEFEATED~~ (loss+1) When the difference between the players is at least 90% and you lose, the lost fight gets counted with the win/loss ballance. [/quote] that means range of fights with outcomes from -10% vs 20% till -10% vs 79% (or -79% vs 10%) is always outcome that attacker gets vict and defender will get retreat, which doesnt matter to balance ratio since it doesnt counts
  50. -1 points
    Fenrir Greycloth

    Dst

    Pip, I speak the truth so others may see the truth. To change if need be. Dst does it out of personal vindication. I want DST to stand up, and to change. For her to stop this public hunting of others. No one should be subject to her harassment. It isn't right. Edit: To those of you who are giving All of these negative remarks? And no reasons given? Do you disagree with what I am saying? Or are you just to immature to see reason?
×
×
  • Create New...